Related Experiment Videos
Pneumatic dilatation and operative treatment of achalasia in children
Insights
Pneumatic dilatation (PD) is the recommended first-line therapy for pediatric achalasia, offering effective relief for many. However, rapid symptom recurrence after PD may indicate the need for subsequent Heller esophageal myotomy (EM).
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Surgical Gastroenterology
Background:
- Achalasia treatment in children remains debated.
- Pneumatic dilatation (PD) and Heller esophageal myotomy (EM) are established therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of PD and EM in pediatric achalasia.
- To determine the optimal sequence of therapeutic interventions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 19 pediatric achalasia cases treated since 1964.
- Analysis of outcomes following pneumatic dilatation and Heller esophageal myotomy.
Main Results:
- Pneumatic dilatation provided dysphagia relief in 11 of 15 patients, with 4 requiring subsequent surgery.
- Heller esophageal myotomy was effective as a primary or secondary treatment.
- Patients with rapid symptom recurrence after PD benefited more from EM.
Conclusions:
- Pneumatic dilatation is a safe and effective initial therapy for pediatric achalasia.
- Early recurrence of symptoms after PD identifies patients likely to require operative myotomy.
Abstract:
The therapeutic approach to children with achalasia of the esophagus is controversial. Both pneumatic dilatation (PD) and Heller esophageal myotomy (EM) are considered effective, while bougienage has been discarded by most authorities. To determine the best place for each in the therapy of achalasia, 19 cases treated since 1964 were reviewed. Ages ranged from 9 months to 17 years (median 11 years), and duration of symptoms ranged from 4 months to 8 years (median 1 year). Three patients had symptoms from infancy. Two patients underwent a successful EM as their sole procedure. Two underwent bougienage as their initial therapy. Dysphagia recurred quickly and both required operation. Fifteen underwent PD under intravenous sedation with a Brown-McHardy dilator placed under fluoroscopy. Seven underwent a single dilatation; seven underwent two; and one underwent four. Relief of dysphagia was achieved in 11 patients, but four required surgery. The patients who experienced adequate relief with dilatation alone were clinically identical to those in whom it failed with respect to age, race, sex, symptom duration, and manometric data. Those who required EM following PD experienced only a brief period of relief following PD (median 1 month) compared with those who enjoyed lasting results (median 18 months). Three patients suffered prolonged chest pain or fever following PD, but without esophageal leakage and with full recovery. Two of eight operative patients developed late postoperative reflux. There were no deaths. Both PD and EM are safe and effective treatments for achalasia. Our results indicate that dilatation is the logical first therapeutic step, but rapid recurrence of symptoms may identify those patients who will require operative myotomy.