Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Titanium modular stems in total hip arthroplasty due to developmental dysplasia: a registry comparison with
Francesco Castagnini1, Monica Cosentino2, Barbara Bordini2
1Orthopaedic-Traumatology and Prosthetic Surgery and Revisions of Hip and Knee Implants, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Introduction:
The routine use of proximal femoral modularity was discouraged in total hip arthroplasties (THAs). However, titanium dual-taper (DT) implants may provide some advantages over single-taper (ST) stems in cases of complex deformity. A registry study comparing ST and DT stems in dysplasia was designed, aiming to assess: (1) survival rates at long-term; (2) reasons for revision; (3) the profile of failed implants.
Methods:
The arthroplasty registry RIPO was investigated for cementless THAs performed for dysplasia since 2000. ST implants were compared to titanium-on-titanium DT stems. Demographics and implant features were collected. Survival rates and reasons for revision were compared. The profile of DT stem failures in dysplasia was defined.
Results:
6429 implants were included in the study, 3642 ST and 2787 DT. The demographic and implant features of the 2 cohorts were not comparable. The DT cohort achieved higher survival rates at long-term (93.9% vs. 91.6%, p = 0.018). DT implants showed a higher rate of implant breakage (0.6%, p = 0.011) and a lower rate of aseptic loosening (p = 0.005). There were no differences in terms of revisions for dislocation. No metallosis occurred. There were more revisions in DT implants in males <65 years, with a 28-mm head size or smaller.
Conclusions:
Modularity did not result in lower survival rates in dysplastic patients and may even reduce the rate of aseptic loosening in comparison to ST stems. The rate of implant breakage is not negligible. Younger males are not good candidates for titanium DT stems.
