Related Experiment Videos
Prescribing sensate focus without proscribing intercourse.
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
|January 1, 1987
Summary
This study suggests avoiding strict intercourse bans in sex therapy. A gentler approach using sensate focus, without forbidding spontaneous activity, reduces treatment failures and side effects for couples.
Area of Science:
- Sex Therapy
- Clinical Psychology
- Human Sexuality
Background:
- Traditional sex therapy often mandates strict prohibitions on intercourse.
- These restrictions can lead to treatment dropout and failure in some couples.
- Alternative approaches are needed to improve treatment adherence and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To challenge the routine prohibition of intercourse in sex therapy.
- To propose a more moderate approach emphasizing sensate focus.
- To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of this alternative method.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing sex therapy protocols.
- Presentation of a modified sensate focus technique.
- Case study analysis to illustrate the proposed method's application and outcomes.
Main Results:
- The proposed moderate approach retains therapeutic benefits of prohibition with fewer adverse effects.
- Reduced instances of treatment flight and failure were observed.
- Enhanced couple engagement and satisfaction were noted.
Conclusions:
- Strict intercourse prohibition in sex therapy is often unnecessary and counterproductive.
- A gentler "proscription" integrating sensate focus offers a viable alternative.
- This approach improves treatment adherence and outcomes by minimizing negative side effects.