Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

5.6K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
5.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early Knee Osteoarthritis Detection by Multi-Component T<sub>2</sub> Mapping.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Adiabatic Pulse Shape Influence on the Orientation Dependence of T<sub>1ρ</sub> Relaxation.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same author

Detection of Early Knee Osteoarthritis Using Multi-Component T<sub>1ρ</sub> Mapping.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2025
Same author

Feasibility of a UTE Stack-of-Spirals Sequence for T<sub>1ρ</sub> Mapping of Achilles Tendinopathy.

NMR in biomedicine·2025
Same author

HSGDNet: Hybrid Synthetic-Data-Guided Deep Learning With NLS Refinement for Fast Multi-Component T1ρ Knee Mapping.

NMR in biomedicine·2025
Same author

Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Model for Quantitative Knee Joint Mapping With MR Fingerprinting and Its Comparison to Dictionary Matching Method: Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Model for Quantitative MRF.

NMR in biomedicine·2025
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Triple-Pulse <sup>23</sup>Na MRI Sequence (TriNa) for Simultaneous Acquisition of Spin-Density-Weighted and Fluid-Attenuated Images.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Design of an 8-Channel Transmit 32-Channel Receive 11.7T Head Coil and Evaluation of SNR Gains.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

The Potential for Absolute Temperature Imaging Based on Brain Metabolites Using an FID-Shifting Approach in Gradient Echo Planar Spectroscopic Imaging (GREPSI).

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring
17:16

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Published on: December 9, 2010

10.4K

Data-driven optimization of sampling patterns for MR brain T1ρ mapping.

Rajiv G Menon1, Marcelo V W Zibetti1, Ravinder R Regatte1

  • 1Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|September 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study optimized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sampling patterns for faster brain T1ρ mapping using a data-driven algorithm. Optimized patterns significantly improved compressed sensing reconstruction, accelerating 3D T1ρ MRI acquisition.

Keywords:
T1ρ mappingalgorithmsbrain MRIdata-driven sampling pattern

More Related Videos

Neuroimaging-Guided TMS&#8211;EEG for Real-Time Cortical Network Mapping
09:55

Neuroimaging-Guided TMS–EEG for Real-Time Cortical Network Mapping

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.0K
A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia
09:59

A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia

Published on: September 16, 2017

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring
17:16

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Published on: December 9, 2010

10.4K
Neuroimaging-Guided TMS&#8211;EEG for Real-Time Cortical Network Mapping
09:55

Neuroimaging-Guided TMS–EEG for Real-Time Cortical Network Mapping

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.0K
A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia
09:59

A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia

Published on: September 16, 2017

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • 3D T1ρ MRI is crucial for brain imaging but often requires long acquisition times.
  • Compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction techniques can accelerate MRI by using undersampled data.
  • Optimizing sampling patterns (SPs) is key to maximizing the effectiveness of CS reconstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply a data-driven optimization algorithm, bias-accelerated subset selection, to generate optimized sampling patterns (OSPs) for 3D T1ρ brain MRI.
  • To evaluate the performance of OSPs with different compressed sensing reconstruction methods for accelerating 3D T1ρ mapping.

Main Methods:

  • Five healthy volunteers underwent fully sampled 3D T1ρ MRI acquisition.
  • Variable density (VD) and Poisson disc (PD) undersampling schemes were used as input for SP optimization.
  • Three CS reconstruction methods (spatiotemporal finite differences, low-rank plus sparse, low-rank) were compared using normalized root mean square error (NRMSE).

Main Results:

  • Optimized sampling patterns (VD-OSP and PD-OSP) significantly reduced NRMSE compared to non-optimized patterns (VD and PD) across various acceleration factors (AF).
  • At AF=30, VD-OSP with spatiotemporal finite differences achieved NRMSE=0.078, outperforming non-optimized VD (NRMSE=0.087).
  • At AF=4, VD-OSP (NRMSE=0.057) outperformed PD-OSP (NRMSE=0.060), demonstrating the superiority of optimized sampling.

Conclusions:

  • Data-driven optimized sampling patterns, when combined with appropriate CS reconstruction, can effectively accelerate 3D T1ρ brain MRI.
  • This approach holds promise for improving the efficiency of brain imaging applications using 3D T1ρ mapping.