Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Analysis of Lymph Node Volume by Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging in the Braf/Pten Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Melanoma
Published on: September 8, 2021
BRAF and NRAS Mutation Status and Response to Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Melanoma
Olivier J van Not1,2, Willeke A M Blokx3, Alfons J M van den Eertwegh4
1Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Purpose:
Little is known about the effect of specific gene mutations on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma.
Materials And Methods:
All patients with advanced melanoma treated with first-line anti-PD-1 or ipilimumab-nivolumab between 2012 and 2021 in the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry were included in this cohort study. Objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to BRAF and NRAS status. A multivariable Cox model was used to analyze prognostic factors associated with PFS and OS.
Results:
In total, 1764 patients received anti-PD-1 and 759 received ipilimumab-nivolumab. No significant differences in PFS were found in the anti-PD-1 cohort. In the ipilimumab-nivolumab cohort, median PFS was significantly higher for BRAF-mutant melanoma (9.9 months; 95% CI, 6.8 to 17.2) compared with NRAS-mutant (4.8 months; 95% CI, 3.0 to 7.5) and double wild-type (5.3 months; 95% CI, 3.6 to 7.1). In multivariable analysis, BRAF-mutant melanoma was significantly associated with a lower risk of progression or death in the ipilimumab-nivolumab cohort. Median OS was significantly higher for BRAF-mutant melanoma compared with NRAS-mutant and double wild-type melanoma for both immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens.
Conclusion:
Ipilimumab-nivolumab-treated patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma display improved PFS and OS compared with patients with NRAS-mutant and double wild-type melanoma. BRAF mutation status is a factor to consider while choosing between mono and dual checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma.
Insights
BRAF mutations improve outcomes for advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab-nivolumab. This finding suggests BRAF status is key when selecting immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Genetics
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized advanced melanoma treatment.
- The impact of specific gene mutations, such as BRAF and NRAS, on ICI efficacy remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between BRAF and NRAS gene mutations and the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma.
- To analyze objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) based on mutation status.
Main Methods:
- A nationwide cohort study included advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 or ipilimumab-nivolumab from 2012-2021.
- Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to BRAF and NRAS mutational status.
- Multivariable Cox regression models assessed prognostic factors for PFS and OS.
Main Results:
- In the ipilimumab-nivolumab cohort, BRAF-mutant melanoma showed significantly longer median PFS (9.9 months) compared to NRAS-mutant (4.8 months) and wild-type (5.3 months).
- BRAF-mutant melanoma was associated with a lower risk of progression or death in the ipilimumab-nivolumab group.
- Both ICI regimens demonstrated significantly higher median OS for BRAF-mutant melanoma.
Conclusions:
- Ipilimumab-nivolumab treatment confers improved PFS and OS in BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma patients compared to those with NRAS-mutant or wild-type melanoma.
- BRAF mutation status is a critical factor to consider when deciding between monotherapy and dual immune checkpoint inhibition for advanced melanoma.
Related Concept Videos
The Ras Gene
Ras is a...
Abnormal Proliferation
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
MAPK Signaling Cascades

