Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Ponatinib in CML and Ph+ ALL: balancing high efficacy with vascular safety.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

Managing patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: a guideline-driven practical guide for primary care physicians.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

CV risk: if you aren't testing ACR, you aren't seeing the full picture.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

Anti-TNF-induced vasculitis: analysis of data from the French national pharmacovigilance database.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

Relationship of serum nesfatin-1 levels with body mass index and c-reactive protein in patients presenting to the emergency department with epileptic seizures.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

Clinical pharmacokinetics of colistimethate sodium and formed colistin in patients with renal impairment or on dialysis modalities: a systematic review and implications for precision dosing.

Postgraduate medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
03:30

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.6K

Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective study.

Chao Ji1, Meng Chen1, Yichen Qin2

  • 1Department of obstetrics, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China.

Postgraduate Medicine
|September 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Extraperitoneal cesarean section (ECS) is a safe and effective elective surgery for primiparas, showing reduced operation times and improved neonatal outcomes compared to transperitoneal cesarean section (TCS). This procedure is recommended for routine use by trained surgeons.

Keywords:
Cesarean sectionmorbiditypregnancyprimiparasafety

More Related Videos

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

14.7K
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
03:43

Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Published on: September 13, 2022

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
03:30

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.6K
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

14.7K
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
03:43

Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Published on: September 13, 2022

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Surgical Procedures
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Background:

  • Cesarean section (CS) is a common surgical procedure for childbirth.
  • Evaluating alternative surgical approaches to CS is crucial for optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes.
  • Extraperitoneal cesarean section (ECS) offers a potential alternative to the traditional transperitoneal approach (TCS).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the safety and efficacy of extraperitoneal cesarean section (ECS) as a routine elective surgical procedure.
  • To compare ECS with transperitoneal cesarean section (TCS) in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes.
  • To determine the feasibility of promoting ECS as a standard surgical option.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study involving 461 primiparas undergoing either ECS or TCS.
  • Participants were allocated to groups based on the surgical approach.
  • Key outcome measures included operation duration, blood loss, postoperative recovery (gas passage, pain), maternal complications, and neonatal indicators.

Main Results:

  • Extraperitoneal cesarean section (ECS) demonstrated a significantly shorter operation duration compared to transperitoneal cesarean section (TCS).
  • Neonates born via ECS exhibited higher birth weights and required fewer neonatal transfers than those born via TCS.
  • No significant differences were observed in other maternal surgical complications or neonatal complications between the ECS and TCS groups.

Conclusions:

  • Extraperitoneal cesarean section (ECS) is a safe and viable routine procedure for elective surgical delivery in primiparas.
  • The advantages of ECS, including reduced operative time and improved neonatal indicators, support its promotion as a routine choice in hospitals.
  • Successful implementation of ECS requires surgeons to be well-trained in the technique.