Prognostic factors of pediatric pelvic and genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: An analysis based on SEER database

Jiheng Wu1, Xinyi Shou2, Jiabin Cai3

  • 1National Clinical Trial Institute, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.

Frontiers in Oncology
|September 22, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Pediatric pelvic and genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) survival is influenced by factors like age and subtype, but radiation therapy (RT) showed no significant survival benefit. Further trials are needed to evaluate RT's role in treating this childhood cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Genitourinary Oncology

Background:

  • Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft-tissue sarcoma in children.
  • Pelvic and genitourinary (GU) RMS represent a significant subset requiring prognostic evaluation.
  • Understanding prognostic factors is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in pediatric RMS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify prognostic factors for pediatric pelvic and GU RMS.
  • To evaluate the impact of radiation therapy (RT) on survival outcomes.
  • To assess survival rates in children diagnosed with pelvic and GU RMS.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patient data.
  • Employed Kaplan-Meier, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models for survival analysis.
  • Conducted propensity score-matched analyses to compare treatment groups, including RT vs. no RT.

Main Results:

  • Embryonic RMS (79.8%) and alveolar RMS (11.1%) were the most common subtypes, with alveolar RMS having the worst prognosis.
  • Testis (46.6%) was the most frequent site, followed by urinary bladder (21.8%) and prostate (18.3%).
  • Favorable prognostic factors included younger age (<15 years), non-alveolar subtype, early stage, specific sites (uterus, testis), surgery, and chemotherapy. RT showed no significant difference in overall or cancer-specific survival.

Conclusions:

  • A nomogram based on independent prognostic factors can predict survival rates.
  • Surgery and chemotherapy are effective, but RT does not guarantee improved survival for pediatric pelvic/GU RMS.
  • Prospective trials are warranted to definitively assess the role of RT in this patient population.
Abstract