Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving01:17

Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving

420
Rolling resistance, also known as rolling friction, is the force that resists the motion of a rolling object, such as a wheel, tire, or ball, when it moves over a surface. It is caused by the deformation of the object and the surface in contact with each other, as well as other factors like internal friction, hysteresis, and energy losses within the materials. Rolling resistance opposes the object's motion, requiring additional energy to overcome it and maintain movement. In practical...
420
One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

545
In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
545
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

285
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
285
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II01:21

Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II

7.5K
A rigid body is in static equilibrium when the net force and the net torque acting on the system are equal to zero.
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
7.5K
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

12.7K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
12.7K
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I00:49

Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I

4.8K
A rigid body is said to be in static equilibrium when the net force and the net torque acting on the system is equal to zero. To solve for rigid body equilibrium problems, do the following steps.
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MATTERIX: toward a digital twin for robotics-assisted chemistry laboratory automation.

Nature computational science·2025
Same author

On the use of simulation in robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for moving forward.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2020
Same author

Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2019
Same author

Kinematic and Gait Similarities between Crawling Human Infants and Other Quadruped Mammals.

Frontiers in neurology·2015
Same author

Controlled Reduction with Unactuated Cyclic Variables: Application to 3D Bipedal Walking with Passive Yaw Rotation.

IEEE transactions on automatic control·2015
Same author

Engineering entrainment and adaptation in limit cycle systems : From biological inspiration to applications in robotics.

Biological cybernetics·2006
Same journal

Editorial: Robotic applications for a sustainable future.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same journal

Passive wheels on legged robots: a survey.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same journal

Politeness cannot make up for robots' errors.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same journal

Workers expect basic social skills but limited autonomy from future robots - a qualitative interview study and taxonomy for robot social skills.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same journal

Human-robot interaction in sustainable hospitality: how robot type shapes customer emotions, green perceptions, and service loyalty.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same journal

Dynamic variance-aware federated tuning for efficient autonomous vehicle perception under non-IID settings.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Kinematics and Ground Reaction Force Determination: A Demonstration Quantifying Locomotor Abilities of Young Adult, Middle-aged, and Geriatric Rats
10:28

Kinematics and Ground Reaction Force Determination: A Demonstration Quantifying Locomotor Abilities of Young Adult, Middle-aged, and Geriatric Rats

Published on: February 22, 2011

19.8K

Model-free reinforcement learning for robust locomotion using demonstrations from trajectory optimization.

Miroslav Bogdanovic1, Majid Khadiv1, Ludovic Righetti1,2

  • 1Movement Generation and Control Group, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.

Frontiers in Robotics and AI
|September 22, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a two-stage reinforcement learning method for robot control. It enables robust policies for real robots using just one demonstration, improving performance in dynamic tasks.

Keywords:
contact uncertaintydeep reinforcement learninglegged locomotionrobust control policiestrajectory optimization

More Related Videos

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.7K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Kinematics and Ground Reaction Force Determination: A Demonstration Quantifying Locomotor Abilities of Young Adult, Middle-aged, and Geriatric Rats
10:28

Kinematics and Ground Reaction Force Determination: A Demonstration Quantifying Locomotor Abilities of Young Adult, Middle-aged, and Geriatric Rats

Published on: February 22, 2011

19.8K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.7K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.5K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Machine Learning
  • Control Theory

Background:

  • Deploying policies on real robots often requires extensive retraining.
  • Existing methods struggle with environmental uncertainties and dynamic tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a general, two-stage reinforcement learning approach for creating robust robot policies.
  • To enable policy deployment on real robots with minimal or no additional training.

Main Methods:

  • A two-stage reinforcement learning framework utilizing a single demonstration from trajectory optimization.
  • Stage one: Demonstration used for initial exploration.
  • Stage two: Direct task reward optimization for robust policy computation.

Main Results:

  • The approach successfully generated robust policies for dynamic hopping and bounding tasks on a quadruped robot.
  • Demonstrated effective policy deployment on real robots without further training.
  • Validated robustness against environmental uncertainties.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed two-stage reinforcement learning method is effective for creating generalizable and robust robot policies.
  • This approach significantly reduces the need for real-world robot retraining.
  • It shows promise for dynamic locomotion tasks in robotics.