Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Echocardiographic Assessment Using Subxiphoid-Only Examination for Hypotensive Patients
Published on: April 18, 2025
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use?
Marcelo Antônio Oliveira Santos-Veloso1,2, Ândrea Virgínia Ferreira Chaves1,2,3, Eveline Barros Calado4
1Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Inovação Terapêutica - Recife (PE), Brazil.
Discrepancies exist in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients between European and American guidelines. Fragmented QRS did not predict outcomes, and current risk stratification algorithms show low accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Genetics
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary genetic heart disease.
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are used for sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention in HCM.
- Current guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Heart Association (AHA) provide differing recommendations for ICD implantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement in ICD indications for HCM patients based on 2014 ESC and 2020 AHA guidelines.
- To assess fragmented QRS (fQRS) as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in HCM.
- To analyze the accuracy of SCD risk stratification algorithms in guiding ICD therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 81 HCM patients (≥16 years) from 2019-2021.
- Kappa coefficient used to assess agreement between ESC and AHA guidelines for ICD indication.
- Kaplan-Meier method for survival and incidence curves; fQRS presence analyzed.
- Exclusion criteria: secondary myocardiopathy, follow-up <1 year.
Main Results:
- fQRS identified in 44.4% of patients; no association with clinical parameters, echocardiography, fibrosis, or SCD risk.
- During 4.8±3.4 years follow-up, no SCD occurred, but 20.6% of ICD recipients received appropriate shocks.
- Shocks occurred in ESC low- to moderate-risk (3), moderate-risk (3), and AHA high-risk (4) patients.
- Overall guideline agreement was 64% (kappa=0.270, p=0.007); C-statistic showed no difference in appropriate shock incidence (p=0.644).
Conclusions:
- Sudden cardiac death risk stratification algorithms exhibit discrepancies in ICD indications for HCM.
- Current risk stratification algorithms demonstrate low accuracy in predicting appropriate ICD shocks.
- Fragmented QRS is not a reliable predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in this HCM cohort.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy

