Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia
Lloyd Duncan1, Michelle Correia2, Palesa Mogane1
1Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.
Insights
Rapid sequence induction (RSI) practices for pediatric patients show significant variation among anesthesiologists. Experience and patient factors influence technique choices, with controlled RSI favored by more experienced practitioners.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pediatric Critical Care
Background:
- Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is crucial for airway management in patients at risk of aspiration.
- Significant variations exist in pediatric RSI practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate current practices of pediatric RSI among anesthesiologists.
- To identify factors influencing RSI technique selection in children.
Main Methods:
- Descriptive, contextual, cross-sectional survey design.
- Self-administered questionnaire distributed to anesthesiologists at the University of the Witwatersrand.
- 126 completed questionnaires analyzed.
Main Results:
- Appendicitis with peritonitis was the primary indication for RSI.
- Preoxygenation rates were high across age groups (87-95%).
- Cricoid pressure use varied significantly by age (p < 0.001), with higher use in children.
- Rocuronium and cisatracurium were common paralytics; suxamethonium was least used in neonates.
- Cuffed endotracheal tubes were predominantly used in children (99.2%) but less in neonates (49.6%).
- Controlled RSI was more frequent in experienced anesthesiologists and for specific procedures like pyloromyotomy and Tenkhoff insertion.
Conclusions:
- Paediatric RSI practices are highly variable among anesthesiologists.
- Variability is influenced by anesthesiologist experience, training, patient factors, and clinical scenario.
- Controlled RSI techniques are more commonly employed by experienced practitioners.
Abstract:
(1) Background: Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is carried out by anaesthetists to secure the airway promptly in patients who are at risk of aspirating gastric content during induction of anaesthesia. RSI requires variation in the paediatric population. We conducted a survey to investigate current practice of paediatric RSI by anaesthetists. (2) Methods: A descriptive, contextual, cross-sectional research design was followed. The study population consisted of all anaesthetists working in the Department of Anaesthesia at the University of the Witwatersrand. Data was collected in the form of a self-administered questionnaire. (3) Results: Of 138 questionnaires that were distributed, 126 were completed. Clinical indication for RSI was predominantly for appendicitis with peritonitis (115/124; 92.7%). Preoxygenation was performed by 95.1% of anaesthetists for children, 87% for infants and 89.4% for neonates. Cricoid pressure was used significantly more in children (56%) than in infants (20.8%) and neonates (10.3%) (p < 0.001). Rocuronium was the paralytic agent of choice in children (42.7%) and infants (38.2%), while cisatracurium was used most frequently in neonates (37.4%). Suxamethonium was used least in neonates. Cuffed ETTs were used most frequently for children (99.2%) and least for neonates (49.6%). Eighty-five percent of anaesthetists omitted cricoid pressure during RSI for pyloromyotomy, for which a controlled RSI was performed more by consultants and senior registrars (p < 0.01). A classic RSI was performed by 53.6% of anaesthetists for laparotomy for small bowel obstruction. Consultants and PMOs were more likely to intubate a child for forearm MUA who was starved for 6 h and received opioids (p < 0.05). Controlled RSI with cisatracurium was the technique of choice for Tenkhoff insertion in a child with renal failure. (4) Conclusions: RSI practice for paediatric patients varied widely among anaesthetists. This may be attributed to a combination of anaesthetic experience, training in paediatric anaesthesia, and patient specific factors, along with the individualised clinical scenario’s aspiration risk. A controlled RSI technique appears to be implemented more frequently by anaesthetists with increased experience.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...

