Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.4K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.4K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.5K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.1K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.8K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

770
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
770
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.9K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public goods games on any population structure.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Punishment in bipartite societies.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Post-disaster resource redistribution and cooperation evolution based on two-layer network evolutionary games.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Inter-role reciprocity in evolutionary trust game on square lattices.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Evolutionary dynamics of any multiplayer game on regular graphs.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Zealous cooperation does not always promote cooperation in public goods games.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Opinion Dynamics with Higher-Order Bounded Confidence.

Chaoqian Wang1

  • 1Program for Computational Social Science, Department of Computational and Data Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a higher-order bounded confidence model for complex systems. A decentralized discussion rule within this model promotes opinion consensus, unlike the classic approach.

Keywords:
HK modelbounded confidencehigher-order interactionopinion dynamics

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Complex Systems Science
  • Social Network Analysis
  • Opinion Dynamics

Background:

  • Classic bounded confidence models simulate opinion formation based on peer averaging.
  • Higher-order interactions in complex systems are increasingly important for understanding emergent behaviors.
  • Existing models often lack the flexibility to capture nuanced group discussion dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the classic bounded confidence model by incorporating higher-order interactions.
  • To investigate opinion dynamics resulting from agents participating in multiple group discussions.
  • To compare the effects of centralized versus decentralized opinion update rules.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a higher-order bounded confidence model where agents participate in group discussions.
  • Implementation and analysis of two distinct opinion dynamics rules: centralized and decentralized.
  • Mathematical modeling and simulation of opinion evolution under these rules.

Main Results:

  • The centralized rule in the higher-order model is shown to be equivalent to the classic bounded confidence model.
  • The decentralized rule demonstrates a capacity to foster opinion consensus among agents.
  • The higher-order framework offers greater convenience for integrating other complex system interactions.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed higher-order bounded confidence model provides a more versatile framework for studying opinion dynamics.
  • Decentralized group discussions are a key mechanism for achieving consensus in complex social systems.
  • This model facilitates the integration of opinion dynamics with other higher-order processes like contagion and evolution.