Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Discrete Event Simulation Model for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Screening for Asymptomatic Patients with Lower
Vojtěch Kamenský1, Vladimír Rogalewicz1, Ondřej Gajdoš1
1Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic.
Insights
Screening for lower limb ischemic disease (LEAD) using ankle-brachial index (ABI) diagnostics is a cost-effective strategy for asymptomatic individuals aged 50 and over. This approach improves health outcomes and offers long-term value compared to no screening.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Preventive Cardiology
Background:
- Lower limb ischemic disease (LEAD) affects many, often asymptomatically, increasing cardiovascular event risk.
- Early detection is crucial to prevent severe outcomes like critical limb ischemia or amputation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of using ankle-brachial index (ABI) diagnostics for screening asymptomatic patients for LEAD.
- To evaluate the impact of ABI screening on limb-related symptoms and overall patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A discrete event simulation model was employed to analyze lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
- Cost-effectiveness analysis compared ABI screening against a no-screening strategy from a healthcare payer perspective.
- Probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to ensure result robustness.
Main Results:
- The ABI screening intervention incurred higher costs (CZK 174,010) versus no screening (CZK 70,177).
- Screening yielded greater benefits (14.73 QALYs) compared to no screening (14.46 QALYs).
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CZK 389,738 per QALY remained below the willingness-to-pay threshold, confirmed by sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions:
- Ankle-brachial index (ABI) screening is a cost-effective strategy for identifying lower limb ischemic disease (LEAD) in asymptomatic individuals aged 50 and above.
- The findings support the implementation of ABI screening to improve patient outcomes and manage cardiovascular risks effectively.
Abstract:
Lower limb ischemic disease (LEAD) affects a significant portion of the population, with most patients being asymptomatic. Patient screening is necessary because LEAD patients have an increased risk of occurrence of other cardiovascular events and manifestations of disease, in terms of leg symptoms such as intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia, or amputation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening using ABI diagnostics in asymptomatic patients and its impact on limb symptoms associated with LEAD. A discrete event simulation model was created to capture lifetime costs and effects. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the health care payer, and the effects were calculated as QALYs. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compare ABI screening examination and the situation without such screening. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were carried out to evaluate the robustness of the results. In the basic setting, the screening intervention was a more expensive intervention, at a cost of CZK 174,010, compared to CZK 70,177 for the strategy without screening. The benefits of screening were estimated at 14.73 QALYs, with 14.46 QALYs without screening. The final ICER value of CZK 389,738 per QALY is below the willingness to pay threshold. Likewise, the results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and of the scenario analysis were below the threshold of willingness to pay, thus confirming the robustness of the results. In conclusion, ABI screening appears to be a cost-effective strategy for asymptomatic patients aged 50 years when compared to the no-screening option.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

