Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Effects of Compression of the Ulnar Artery on the Radial Artery Catheterization
Cho-Long Kim1,2, Seung-Wan Hong2, Seong-Hyop Kim2,3,4
1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hanyang University Medical Center, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea.
Insights
Ulnar artery compression increases radial artery blood flow and cross-sectional area. This technique significantly reduces the time for successful ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Radiology
Background:
- Radial artery catheterization is a common procedure.
- Ensuring adequate blood flow in the radial artery is crucial for successful catheterization.
- Ulnar artery compression is a potential method to augment radial artery parameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of ulnar artery compression on radial artery blood flow (BF) and internal cross-sectional area (CSAi).
- To assess the impact of ulnar artery compression on the success rate and time of first-attempt ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization.
Main Methods:
- Patients were randomized into two groups: Compression (ulnar artery compressed) and Standard (no compression).
- Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization was performed.
- Radial artery BF and CSAi were measured before and after compression.
- Success rate and time for first-attempt catheterization were recorded.
Main Results:
- Ulnar artery compression significantly increased radial artery BF (p < 0.001) and CSAi (p < 0.001).
- The time to successful first-attempt catheterization was significantly shorter in the Compression group (34s vs. 46s, p < 0.001).
- A trend towards a higher success rate was observed in the Compression group (p = 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Compression of the ulnar artery effectively augments radial artery blood flow and cross-sectional area.
- This maneuver leads to a significant reduction in the time required for successful first-attempt ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization.
Abstract:
Background: The study was designed to evaluate the effects of compression of the ulnar artery on blood flow (BF) and internal cross-sectional area (CSAi) of the radial artery. We also evaluated the success rate and time of successful ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization at the first attempt with or without compression of the ulnar artery. Methods: Patients were randomly allocated to the Compression group or Standard group to be treated with or without the application of ulnar artery compression, respectively. Hemodynamic stability was confirmed, and ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization was performed. In the Compression group, an assistant compressed the ulnar artery at 5 cm above the wrist crease and the catheterization was performed after the loss of the distal ulnar artery BF. In the Standard group, the catheterization was performed without compression of the ulnar artery. Before and after the catheterization, BF and CSAi of the radial artery were evaluated. Success rate and time to successful catheterization at the first attempt were recorded. Results: BF and CSAi of the radial artery were similar in the two groups (37.5 [19.3−66] vs. 37.0 [20.6−53.7] mL/min, respectively, p = 0.63; 4.0 [4.0−6.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0−5.0] mm2, respectively, p = 0.095). In the Compression group, BF and CSAi were changed to 80.9 [35.9−128.5] mL/min (p < 0.001) and 5.0 [4.0−7.0] mm2 (p < 0.001), respectively, after compression of the ulnar artery. There was a trend that the success rate of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization at the first attempt was higher in the Compression group than in the Standard group (58/59 vs. 53/59, respectively, p = 0.05), although the difference was not statistically significant. However, the time to successful ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization at the first attempt was significantly shorter in the Compression group than in the Standard group (34 [27−41] s vs. 46 [36−60] s, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Compression of the ulnar artery augmented BF and CSAi of the radial artery. It resulted in a significantly shorter success time for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization at the first attempt.
Related Concept Videos
Arteries of the Upper Limbs
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

