Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection Using Compressed Sensing Accelerated 4D Flow MRI.
Ozden Kilinc1, Stanley Chu1, Justin Baraboo1,2
1Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Compressed sensing (CS) accelerated 4D Flow MRI shows promise for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) evaluation, offering shorter scan times. While hemodynamic trends are similar, CS impacts flow quantification in the false lumen more significantly.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Physics
- Radiology
Background:
- Four-dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4D Flow MRI) is crucial for assessing blood flow patterns.
- The impact of compressed sensing (CS) acceleration on aortic hemodynamic quantification in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of CS-accelerated 4D Flow MRI against GRAPPA-accelerated 4D Flow MRI (GRAPPA) for evaluating aortic hemodynamics in TBAD patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 12 TBAD patients and 2 volunteers using 1.5T 4D Flow MRI.
- Acquisitions included GRAPPA (R=2) and two CS accelerations (R=7.7 and R=10.2) for reproducibility assessment.
- Quantification of voxelwise kinetic energy (KE), peak velocity (PV), forward flow (FF), reverse flow (RF), and stasis, alongside plane-based mid-lumen flows.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in KE and FF in the true lumen (TL) or PV in the false lumen (FL) among acquisition types.
- GRAPPA showed higher PV and stasis in TL, and lower KE, FF, and RF in FL compared to CS accelerations.
- Moderate to excellent interscan reproducibility (ICC: 0.732-0.989) was observed, with strong correlations in TL (r: 0.781-0.986) and variable correlations in FL (r: 0.347-0.948).
Conclusions:
- CS-accelerated 4D Flow MRI offers potential clinical utility in TBAD due to reduced scan times.
- While overall hemodynamic trends are comparable, CS acceleration influences KE, FF, RF, and stasis, particularly within the FL.
More Related Videos
07:12Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
09:24O-Ring Aortic Banding Versus Traditional Transverse Aortic Constriction for Modeling Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
Published on: October 6, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Magnetic Resonance Imaging