Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Tumor regression during radiotherapy as a predictor of response in locally advanced nonsmall cell carcinoma
Arun Thimmarayappa1, Nidhun V Ashok1, Rambha Pandey1
1Department of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Aims:
To compare the predicted response with observed response to treatment by measuring gross tumor volume-primary (GTVp) using onboard kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), to analyze the serial tumor volumes during radiotherapy (RT) with serial tumor volumes during follow-up, and to identify the variables associated with survival outcomes.
Materials And Methods:
Between June 2017 and December 2019, 23 patients of histologically proven locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) received definitive chemoradiation. Serial kV-CBCT images X-ray volume imaging (XVI) were generated weekly for image guidance and were used to generate serial GTVp. Posttreatment follow-up images were used to generate follow-up GTVp. Relative volume regression (VR) during RT and relative response assessment (RA) during follow-up were defined from Avg Vol, of planning CT. The predicted progression model was generated from VR and analyzed against observed progression events. Regression-response model was generated to analyze VR against RA.
Results:
The median XVI vol1, XVI vol2, and XVI vol3 were 78.123, 56.571, and 48.513 cc during the 2nd, 4th, and 6th weeks of RT, respectively. The median VR0 was 11.777% in the 2nd-week, VR1 was 20.959% in the 4th week, and 33.661% in the 6th week. The predicted responders and progression using the VR were similar to the observed response during the follow-up. The prediction of both RA0 and RA1 obtained from VR2 was statistically significant. Predication of RA0 from VR1 tended towards significant (P=0.084). VR2 was statistically significant in predicting RA2 (P = 0.04). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.2 months (95% confidence interval, 20.3-28.2 months). There was no statistically significant difference in PFS and OS between Avg Vol ≤ 99.5 cc and > 99.5 cc or other clinical parameters.
Conclusions:
Tumor regression during RT is a potential predictor of response in LA-NSCLC. kV-CBCT is a strong tool in assessing tumor regression during RT.
More Related Videos
05:39Author Spotlight: Radiotherapy and Clonogenic Assays for Advancing Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine
Published on: April 5, 2024
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018