Mechanical bowel preparation with or without oral antibiotics for rectal resection for cancer (REPCA trial): a study

Aleksandra Olkina1, Aleksei Karachun2, Sergey Bagnenko2

  • 1N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 68 Leningradskaya Street, pos. Pesochniy, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. olkina.aleksandra@yandex.ru.

Techniques in Coloproctology
|September 23, 2022
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study investigates if mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotics improves outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Results will clarify the role of oral antibiotics in reducing postoperative complications.

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Limited randomized trials exist on mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and oral antibiotics (OA) for rectal surgery.
  • Existing evidence on OA's role in rectal surgery is inconsistent.
  • Investigating OA's impact alongside MBP is crucial for optimizing preoperative protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical value of MBP with or without OA (Alfa Normix®) in reducing postoperative complications.
  • To determine if the addition of OA to MBP offers superior outcomes in rectal cancer resection.
  • To provide evidence-based guidance for preoperative bowel preparation strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.
  • Comparison of MBP (Moviprep®) + OA (Alfa Normix®) versus MBP alone.
  • Primary endpoint: Incisional surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days post-surgery.
  • Secondary endpoints include anastomotic leakage and other complications.

Main Results:

  • Results are pending from the REPCA trial.
  • The study is designed to detect significant differences in SSI rates between the two groups.
  • Analysis will also cover secondary outcomes like anastomotic leakage.

Conclusions:

  • The REPCA trial will establish whether MBP + OA is superior to MBP alone for rectal cancer surgery.
  • Findings may influence current preoperative practices for rectal cancer patients.
  • Improved postoperative outcomes are anticipated if the combined approach proves beneficial.