Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

39.8K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
39.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fe(II)-driven abiotic-biotic relay alleviates denitrification bottleneck via chemical nitrite reduction and intracellular carbon.

Water research·2026
Same author

Anterior Cingulate Cortex Mediates State-Dependent Prioritization of Distressed Conspecifics.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

A Multi-omics Framework Combining Genomics and Proteomics for Silicosis Prediction in Chinese Workers - Jiangsu Province, China, 2023-2024.

China CDC weekly·2026
Same author

Investigation and intervention of psychological factors among migrant workers in electronics enterprises in Kunshan, China.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Precision occupational lead exposure assessment through medical-informed machine learning.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2026
Same author

A Genomic Catalog of Migratory Microbiomes from Wild Birds across China's Habitats.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 27, 2025

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
07:24

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

14.6K

[Comparative analysis of different fecal DNA extraction methods].

Zhiyuan Shi1,2, Luping Chen1, Boxing Li1

  • 1CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao = Chinese Journal of Biotechnology
|September 24, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Choosing the right DNA extraction kit is crucial for accurate gut microbiome analysis. Kit Q excelled in extracting DNA from gut bacteria, particularly Gram-positive species like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium.

Keywords:
fecesgenomic DNAgut microbiotaquantified PCR

More Related Videos

Analysis of Fecal Microbiota Dynamics in Lupus-Prone Mice Using a Simple, Cost-Effective DNA Isolation Method
05:28

Analysis of Fecal Microbiota Dynamics in Lupus-Prone Mice Using a Simple, Cost-Effective DNA Isolation Method

Published on: May 2, 2022

2.2K
Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing
08:05

Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: March 19, 2018

19.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 27, 2025

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
07:24

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

14.6K
Analysis of Fecal Microbiota Dynamics in Lupus-Prone Mice Using a Simple, Cost-Effective DNA Isolation Method
05:28

Analysis of Fecal Microbiota Dynamics in Lupus-Prone Mice Using a Simple, Cost-Effective DNA Isolation Method

Published on: May 2, 2022

2.2K
Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing
08:05

Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: March 19, 2018

19.8K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Genomics
  • Human Health

Background:

  • Gut microbiota composition is linked to human health and disease.
  • Experimental methods, including DNA extraction, can impact microbiome analysis.
  • Standardized DNA extraction is vital for reliable gut microbial profiling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficiency of five commercial DNA extraction kits.
  • To evaluate DNA purity, concentration, and yield from specific intestinal species.
  • To guide the selection of optimal DNA extraction methods for gut microbiome research.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to assess DNA extraction efficiency.
  • Five different commercial DNA extraction kits were evaluated.
  • DNA purity, concentration, and genomic DNA abundance were measured.

Main Results:

  • Kit Q demonstrated superior DNA extraction, especially for Gram-positive bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium).
  • Kit N showed comparable purity to Kit Q but lower DNA concentration.
  • Kits M, TG, and PSP exhibited lower overall efficiency and quality compared to Kit Q and N.

Conclusions:

  • Kit Q is recommended for comprehensive gut microbiome analysis, particularly for Gram-positive bacteria.
  • The choice of DNA extraction kit significantly influences gut microbial profiling.
  • This study provides a basis for selecting appropriate DNA extraction methods in microecological research.