Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

04:17
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
Published on: May 10, 2024
849
Evaluation of deep learning and transform domain feature extraction techniques for land cover classification:
Hemani Parikh1, Samir Patel2, Vibha Patel3
1Computer Science and Engineering, School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
|September 24, 2022
Summary
This study enhances land cover classification accuracy using deep learning and wavelet transform features. Fusing Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE) and Haar Wavelet Transform (HWT) features, along with Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), significantly improves classification, especially for challenging land cover types.
Area of Science:
- Remote Sensing
- Machine Learning
- Image Processing
Background:
- Accurate land cover classification is crucial for environmental monitoring.
- Traditional methods struggle with feature extraction and imbalanced datasets in SAR data.
- Deep learning and transform domain techniques offer potential improvements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare deep learning and transform domain feature extraction for SAR land cover classification.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of fusing Convolutional Autoencoders (CAE) and Haar Wavelet Transforms (HWT) features.
- To assess the impact of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) on imbalanced datasets.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Convolutional Autoencoders (CAE), Variational Autoencoders (VAE), and Haar Wavelet Transforms (HWT) for feature extraction.
- Implemented feature fusion of CAE and HWT for improved information capture.
- Applied Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance.
- Employed hierarchical classification to differentiate similar land cover types.
Main Results:
- Feature fusion of CAE and HWT effectively combined high- and low-frequency information, boosting classification accuracy.
- SMOTE significantly increased training samples, mitigating issues with imbalanced data.
- Hierarchical classification improved discrimination between visually similar classes like forest and agricultural land.
- The study demonstrated improved classification performance on RISAT-1 and AIRSAR datasets.
Conclusions:
- Fusing CAE and HWT features offers a robust approach for SAR land cover classification.
- SMOTE is effective in handling imbalanced datasets for improved classification outcomes.
- Hierarchical classification combined with advanced feature extraction provides a valuable guidance for accurate land cover mapping.
Related Concept Videos
Survival Tree
136
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
136
Extraction: Advanced Methods
510
Metal ions can be separated from one another by complexation with organic ligands–the chelating agent– to form uncharged chelates. Here, the chelating agent must contain hydrophobic groups and behave as a weak acid, losing a proton to bind with the metal. Since most organic ligands used in this process are insoluble or undergo oxidation in the aqueous phase, the chelating agent is initially added to the organic phase and extracted into the aqueous phase. The metal-ligand complex is...
510

