Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

6.0K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
6.0K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

233
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
233
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

408
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
408
Lobes of the Cerebrum01:22

Lobes of the Cerebrum

874
The cerebral cortex, a critical structure of the brain, is intricately divided into two hemispheres, each consisting of four distinct lobes: occipital, temporal, frontal, and parietal. These lobes function cooperatively to regulate various cognitive and sensory functions, forming the basis of our complex neural capabilities.
Frontal lobe
The frontal lobes, located behind the forehead, are the command center of our brain, controlling personality, intelligence, and voluntary muscle movements....
874
Prosopagnosia01:24

Prosopagnosia

236
Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...
236
Vision01:24

Vision

55.1K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
55.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lip-reading and eye-gaze discrimination are functionally lateralized across the left and right posterior superior temporal sulci.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Distinct mechanisms of contextual modulation for dynamic natural scenes in motion- and scene-selective cortex.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Galectin-3 induces neurodevelopmental apical-basal polarity and regulates gyrification.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Neuropsychological evidence of a third visual pathway specialized for social perception.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Extracellular vesicles in TDP-43 proteinopathies: pathogenesis and biomarker potential.

Molecular neurodegeneration·2025
Same author

Moving and Static Faces, Bodies, Objects, and Scenes Are Differentially Represented across the Three Visual Pathways.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
10:33

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

12.9K

Measuring the response to visually presented faces in the human lateral prefrontal cortex.

Lara Nikel1, Magdalena W Sliwinska2, Emel Kucuk1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

Cerebral Cortex Communications
|September 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The human brain has multiple face-selective areas. Neuroimaging reveals the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) responds similarly to the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), suggesting shared cognitive functions in face processing.

Keywords:
dynamic face processingfusiform face area (FFA)occipital face area (OFA)superior temporal sulcus (STS)visual field mapping

More Related Videos

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

9.6K
Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
10:33

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

12.9K
Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

9.6K
Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Human Brain Function

Background:

  • Multiple face-selective areas are identified in the human brain through neuroimaging.
  • The functional response of the lateral prefrontal cortex face area is compared to other face-selective regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the functional response of the face area in the lateral prefrontal cortex with other face-selective areas.
  • To investigate the role of the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) in face perception.

Main Methods:

  • fMRI neuroimaging was used to scan participants viewing videos and static images of faces, bodies, scenes, and objects.
  • Experiments involved comparing responses to moving vs. static faces and analyzing visual field biases.

Main Results:

  • A face-selective area was identified in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG).
  • The rIFG, right posterior superior temporal sulcus (rpSTS), and right occipital face area (rOFA) responded more to moving than static faces.
  • The rIFG and rpSTS showed no visual field bias, unlike the rOFA and right fusiform face area (rFFA).

Conclusions:

  • The face area in the IFG was less reliably identified than occipitotemporal face areas.
  • The similar response profiles of the IFG and pSTS suggest they may perform comparable cognitive functions in face processing.