Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Little risks and big fears.

P W Huber

    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
    |June 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Regulatory decisions on "unacceptably hazardous" and "acceptably safe" risks face challenges with de minimis legal concepts. Current public policy for risk evaluation is largely unimplemented.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A role for aromatic amino acids in the binding of Xenopus ribosomal protein L5 to 5S rRNA.

    Biochemistry·2001
    Same author

    The structure of helix III in Xenopus oocyte 5 S rRNA: an RNA stem containing a two-nucleotide bulge.

    Journal of molecular biology·2001
    Same author

    A proline-rich protein binds to the localization element of Xenopus Vg1 mRNA and to ligands involved in actin polymerization.

    The EMBO journal·2001
    Same author

    Inhibition of RNA polymerase III transcription by a ribosome-associated kinase activity.

    Nucleic acids research·1998
    Same author

    Binding of neomycin to the TAR element of HIV-1 RNA induces dissociation of Tat protein by an allosteric mechanism.

    Biochemistry·1998
    Same author

    Analysis of the binding of Xenopus transcription factor IIIA to oocyte 5 S rRNA and to the 5 S rRNA gene.

    The Journal of biological chemistry·1996
    Same journal

    The NTP Chronic Inhalation Study Does Not Support an Inherent Lung Cancer Hazard of Talc: Implications of Lung Particle Overload and Maximum Tolerated Dose.

    Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
    Same journal

    Consideration of Carcinogenicity and Mode of Action Information by an Independent Expert Panel to Support Derivation of No-Significant-Risk-Level Values for Vinyl Acetate Monomer.

    Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
    Same journal

    Which carcinogenicity study should I use? Automated identification of reliable studies.

    Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
    Same journal

    Adoption of artificial intelligence in drug review across the lifecycle: Transformation of regulatory decision-making.

    Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
    Same journal

    Cardiovascular outcomes following intrauterine and lactational exposure to cyantraniliprole in male Wistar rats.

    Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
    Same journal

    Pesticide residue and mycotoxin occurrence in apples and their impact on human health in Morocco.

    Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Regulatory Science
    • Risk Assessment
    • Public Policy

    Background:

    • Growing emphasis on legal terminology of de minimis.
    • Regulatory decisions involve concepts of "unacceptably hazardous" and "acceptably safe" risks.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • Outline various aspects of regulatory decisions.
    • Analyze the interplay between hazard/safety concepts and de minimis.
    • Evaluate the current state of public policy implementation for risk evaluations.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of regulatory decision-making frameworks.
    • Analysis of legal terminology related to risk.
    • Conceptual evaluation of safety and hazard thresholds.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Identification of challenges in applying de minimis to regulatory safety standards.
    • Demonstration of inconsistencies in defining "unacceptably hazardous" and "acceptably safe" levels.
    • Highlighting the gap between policy ideals and practical risk evaluation implementation.

    Conclusions:

    • Current public policy for risk evaluations is significantly underdeveloped.
    • Exceptions are rare where proper risk evaluation policy is implemented.
    • Further development is needed to bridge legal concepts and practical regulatory decision-making.