Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Dylan A Levy1, Jaimin J Patel1, Shaun A Nguyen1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.

Abstract

Insights

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors show efficacy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). A meta-analysis suggests PD-1 inhibitors may reduce progressive disease compared to PD-L1 inhibitors.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors represent a significant advancement in cancer treatment.
  • These immunotherapies have shown promise for patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in HNSCC patients.
  • To compare outcomes between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor treatments within the HNSCC population.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of eleven clinical trials involving 1088 HNSCC patients.
  • Outcomes assessed included median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Main Results:

  • The overall median overall survival (mOS) was 7.97 months, and the mean median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 2.84 months.
  • PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated a significantly lower rate of RECIST Progressive Disease (42.61%) compared to PD-L1 inhibitors (56.79%) (P < 0.001).
  • The incidence of any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was similar between the two inhibitor types (62.7%).

Conclusions:

  • The meta-analysis confirms the efficacy of both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in treating HNSCC.
  • A potential difference in RECIST criteria outcomes between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors warrants further investigation into their clinical significance.

Related Concept Videos

Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
7.8K
Inhibition of Cdk Activity02:34

Inhibition of Cdk Activity

The orderly progression of the cell cycle depends on the activation of Cdk protein by binding to its cyclin partner. However, the cell cycle must be restricted when undergoing abnormal changes. Most cancers correlate to the deregulated cell cycle, and since Cdks are a central component of the cell cycle, Cdk inhibitors are extensively studied to develop anticancer agents. For instance, cyclin D associates with several Cdks, such as Cdk 4/6, to form an active complex. The cyclin D-Cdk4/6 complex...
4.9K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.0K