Related Concept Videos
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground...
Information Processing Approach
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Digital Technologies for Children With Hearing Impairments to Support Language Learning: Scoping Review.
Artificial intelligence outperforms humans in morphology-based oocyte selection in cattle.
The Relationship Between Personality and Flow: A Meta-Analysis.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Mixed Reality for Education MRE Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering
Published on: June 23, 2023
How future proof is design education? A systematic review.
Lore Brosens1,2, Annelies Raes3,4, Johanna Renny Octavia5
1Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Ghent University, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Design education curricula require updates to meet future demands. This review identifies gaps in 21st-century skills, student-centered learning, and formative assessment, urging curriculum reform for future readiness.
More Related Videos
Area of Science:
- Design Education
- Curriculum Development
- Educational Pedagogy
Background:
- The contemporary world necessitates adaptation in design education.
- Understanding curriculum gaps is crucial for aligning design programs with future needs.
- Existing design curricula may not adequately prepare students for evolving industry challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review design curricula for identified gaps.
- To assess the future readiness of design education.
- To provide recommendations for curriculum enhancement.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of 95 studies was conducted.
- Searches included academic databases and discipline-specific journals.
- The constructive alignment framework guided the analysis.
Main Results:
- Curricula need enhanced 21st-century learning objectives, emphasizing skills alongside knowledge.
- Teaching and learning activities should be more student-centered and industry-aligned.
- A significant gap exists in literature regarding formative assessment methods and guidelines.
Conclusions:
- Design education is currently not fully prepared for future challenges.
- Design departments should critically re-evaluate and revise curricula.
- Addressing identified gaps is essential for improving future readiness in design education.

