Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Potential pooling opportunities: cancer.

M A Friedman

    Statistics in Medicine
    |April 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Pooling clinical data enhances statistical confidence in research. However, meaningful conclusions require homogeneous patient populations and comparable therapies, especially for cancer treatment studies with sufficient randomized trials.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Pharmacokinetics of acrylamide after oral administration in male rats.

    Environmental toxicology and pharmacology·2011
    Same author

    Induction of tunica vaginalis mesotheliomas in rats by xenobiotics.

    Critical reviews in toxicology·2009
    Same author

    Three-generation reproduction study of rats receiving acrylonitrile in drinking water.

    Toxicology letters·2002
    Same author

    Remarks of the Lead Deputy Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration.

    Food and drug law journal·2002
    Same author

    The effects of adult acquired flatfoot deformity on tibiotalar joint contact characteristics.

    Foot & ankle international·2001
    Same author

    Manufacturer's warning regarding unapproved uses of misoprostol.

    The New England journal of medicine·2001
    Same journal

    Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical data analysis
    • Cancer research methodology
    • Statistical confidence in clinical trials

    Background:

    • Pooling large-scale clinical data can increase statistical power for modern investigations.
    • The validity of pooled analyses hinges on the homogeneity or comparability of study populations and treatments.
    • Opportunities exist for pooling cancer treatment studies, particularly those with numerous completed randomized trials.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the conditions under which pooling clinical data is appropriate.
    • To identify key requirements for drawing meaningful conclusions from pooled data.
    • To highlight specific cancer types suitable for pooled study analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of methodologies for clinical data pooling.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of criteria for population and therapy comparability.
  • Identification of cancer types with a substantial number of completed randomized studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinical data pooling is beneficial when statistical confidence is paramount.
    • Homogeneity of study populations and therapies is critical for specific conclusions.
    • Colon cancer, gastric cancer, hepatoma, ovarian cancer, and lymphoma present attractive opportunities for pooled studies.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective pooling of clinical data requires careful consideration of population and treatment homogeneity.
    • Randomized studies in specific cancer types offer promising avenues for data pooling.
    • This approach can lead to more robust and meaningful findings in cancer treatment research.