Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations.

D L Demets

    Statistics in Medicine
    |April 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary

    Combining data from multiple studies is useful but requires careful scientific judgment. The most critical limitation is determining which studies should be included, even with significant interactions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials.

    Journal of internal medicine·2004
    Same author

    Considerations in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. summary of a National Institutes of Health workshop.

    Controlled clinical trials·2001
    Same author

    Statistical issues relating to international differences in clinical trials.

    American heart journal·2001
    Same author

    Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure.

    The New England journal of medicine·2001
    Same author

    The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: Some final thoughts.

    American heart journal·2001
    Same author

    An overview of group sequential methods in longitudinal clinical trials.

    Statistical methods in medical research·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trials
    • Meta-Analysis

    Background:

    • Methods for combining data from multiple studies are available and beneficial.
    • A significant limitation exists in determining appropriate criteria for study inclusion in data pooling.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the methodological challenges in selecting studies for data combination.
    • To emphasize the need for scientific input in defining inclusion criteria for pooled analyses.

    Main Methods:

    • Discussion of existing methods for data combination.
    • Identification of the primary methodological limitation in study selection.
    • Consideration of statistical interaction and effect direction as factors.

    Main Results:

    • Current methods do not adequately address the selection of studies for data pooling.
    • Substantial scientific expertise is necessary to establish study inclusion criteria.
    • Even studies with statistically significant interactions may warrant cautious combination if effects align.

    Conclusions:

    • Data pooling offers valuable insights but must be approached with caution.
    • Pooling data does not substitute for well-designed prospective clinical trials.
    • Developing standardized design criteria for multicenter and multinational trials could facilitate data combination.

    Related Experiment Videos