Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Avoiding Systematic Bias in Orthopedics Research Through Informed Variable Selection: A Discussion of Confounders,
Katrina L Devick1, Isabella Zaniletti1, Dirk R Larson2
1Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Abstract:
There are 3 common variable types in orthopedic research-confounders, colliders, and mediators. All 3 types of variables are associated with both the exposure (eg, surgery type, implant type, body mass index) and outcome (eg, complications, revision surgery) but differ in their temporal ordering. To reduce systematic bias, the decision to include or exclude a variable in an analysis should be based on the variable's relationship with the exposure and outcome for each research question. In this article, we define 3 types of variables with case examples from orthopedic research. Please visit the followinghttps://youtu.be/V-grpgB1ShQfor videos that explain the highlights of the article in practical terms.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blind Procedures
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

