Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Socio-ecological gap analysis to forecast species range contractions for conservation
Nyeema C Harris1, Asia Murphy2, Aalayna R Green3
1Applied Wildlife Ecology Lab, Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Conservation planning for 91 African carnivores reveals significant range contraction risks. Identifying gaps in available conservation capacity (ACC) is crucial for prioritizing efforts and mitigating human-wildlife conflict.
Area of Science:
- Conservation Biology
- Spatial Ecology
- Biodiversity Science
Background:
- Effective conservation planning necessitates robust needs assessments and prioritization schemes.
- Traditional range maps often lack crucial data on population and spatial variation, hindering accurate biodiversity assessments.
- Existing gap analyses primarily focus on protected area coverage, overlooking broader socio-ecological factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To integrate spatially explicit threat and resource layers to identify conservation capacity gaps for 91 African carnivore species.
- To move beyond traditional gap analyses by incorporating socio-ecological factors into conservation planning.
- To inform decision-making and resource allocation for inclusive carnivore conservation.
Main Methods:
- Aggregated threat layers (drought, human pressures) and resource layers (protected areas, cultural diversity) across carnivore ranges.
- Developed a socio-ecological gap analysis model to quantify available conservation capacity (ACC).
- Analyzed ACC across 91 African carnivore species, considering body size and taxonomy.
Main Results:
- All analyzed species face potential range contraction, with an average predicted loss of 15% of their range.
- Available conservation capacity (ACC) varied significantly based on species' body size and taxonomic group.
- Findings challenged current extinction risk perceptions for 'Least Concern' species and provided insights for 'Data Deficient' species.
Conclusions:
- The socio-ecological gap analysis provides a novel geospatial approach to guide conservation investments and strategies.
- Understanding ACC dynamics is vital for forecasting species' range shifts in response to environmental and social changes.
- This framework supports proactive mitigation of human-wildlife conflict and promotes equitable carnivore conservation globally.
More Related Videos
16:02Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
12:26Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
Published on: October 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Habitat Fragmentation
Conservation of Declining Populations
Ecological Niches
Threats to Biodiversity
What is Conservation Biology?
Conservation of Small Populations