Attenuation correction for phantom tests: an alternative to maximum-likelihood attenuation correction factor-based
Tetsuro Mizuta1, Yoshiyuki Yamakawa2, Suzuka Minagawa2
1Medical Systems Division, Shimadzu Corporation, 1, Nishinokyo Kuwabara-cho, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto, 604-8511, Japan. mizuta@shimadzu.co.jp.
Objectives:
This study evaluates the phantom attenuation correction (PAC) method as an alternative to maximum-likelihood attenuation correction factor (ML-ACF) correction in time-of-flight (TOF) brain positron emission tomography (PET) studies.
Methods:
In the PAC algorithm, a template emission image [Formula: see text] and a template attenuation coefficient image [Formula: see text] are prepared as a data set based on phantom geometry. Position-aligned attenuation coefficient image [Formula: see text] is derived by aligning [Formula: see text] using parameters that match the template emission image [Formula: see text] to measured emission image [Formula: see text]. Then, attenuation coefficient image [Formula: see text] combined with a headrest image is used for scatter and attenuation correction in the image reconstruction. To evaluate the PAC algorithm as an alternative to ML-ACF, Hoffman 3D brain and cylindrical phantoms were measured to obtain the image quality indexes of contrast and uniformity. These phantoms were also wrapped with a radioactive sheet to obtain attenuation coefficient images using ML-ACF. Emission images were reconstructed with attenuation correction by PAC and ML-ACF, and the results were compared using contrast and uniformity as well as visual assessment. CT attenuation correction (CT-AC) was also applied as a reference.
Results:
The contrast obtained by ML-ACF was slightly overestimated due to its unique experimental condition for applying ML-ACF in Hoffman 3D brain phantom but the uniformity was almost equivalent among ML-ACF, CT-AC, and PAC. PAC showed reasonable result without overestimation compared to ML-ACF and CT-AC.
Conclusions:
PAC is an attenuation correction method that can ensure the performance in phantom test, and is considered to be a reasonable alternative to clinically used ML-ACF-based attenuation correction.
More Related Videos
08:36Multi-Tracer Studies of Brain Oxygen and Glucose Metabolism Using a Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scanner
Published on: June 7, 2024
10:21Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
Published on: August 8, 2019
