Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

184
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
184
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.1K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.1K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

281
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
281
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

3.9K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A theory of multiattribute search and choice.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Predicting health-related quality of life two years post-diagnosis across seven cancer types: using machine learning to identify vulnerable patients.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Parameter estimation of hyper-spherical diffusion models with a time-dependent threshold: An integral equation method.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Identifying similarity- and rule-based processes in quantitative judgments: A multi-method approach combining cognitive modeling and eye tracking.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Disentangling choice value and choice conflict in sequential decisions under risk.

PLoS computational biology·2022
Same author

Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies.

eLife·2021
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The effect of source expertise on the persuasiveness and sharing of health information on social media: A systematic review.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 27, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

A robust Bayesian test for identifying context effects in multiattribute decision-making.

Dimitris Katsimpokis1, Laura Fontanesi2, Jörg Rieskamp2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62A, 4055, Basel, Switzerland. dimitris.katsimpokis@unibas.ch.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|September 28, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New statistical methods improve the analysis of context effects in decision-making. Researchers propose a robust Bayesian approach for relative choice share (RST) and introduce absolute choice share (AST) for more accurate results.

Keywords:
Attraction effectBayesian modelsCompromise effectContext effectsSimilarity effect

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 27, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Decision science
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Context effects significantly influence multiattribute decision-making, leading to the development of psychological theories.
  • Statistical analysis of these context effects has received less attention compared to theoretical explanations.
  • Traditional measures like relative choice share (RST) have limitations in accurately capturing these effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address weaknesses in the traditional definition and measurement of relative choice share (RST).
  • To propose and validate a more appropriate and robust statistical approach for analyzing context effects.
  • To introduce the absolute choice share of the target (AST) as a suitable measure for the attraction effect.

Main Methods:

  • Critiqued the existing definition of RST and proposed a new, more appropriate measure.
  • Conducted large-scale simulations to demonstrate biases in the traditional RST measure.
  • Developed and applied a Bayesian approach for estimating a robust RST.
  • Introduced and applied the absolute choice share of the target (AST) measure.
  • Re-analyzed data from five published studies (N=738) using both traditional and proposed methods.

Main Results:

  • The traditional RST measure can lead to biased inferences in statistical analyses.
  • The proposed Bayesian approach provides a robust and accurate estimation of RST.
  • The absolute choice share of the target (AST) is identified as the appropriate measure for the attraction effect.
  • Applying the robust RST and AST measures yielded qualitatively different results in at least 25% of the analyzed studies.

Conclusions:

  • Robust statistical testing is crucial for the reliable development of psychological theories on decision-making.
  • The proposed statistical measures (robust RST and AST) offer more accurate insights into context effects.
  • Re-evaluating existing data with improved methods reveals significant differences, underscoring the importance of methodological rigor.