Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Midterm outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement in elderly patients: A propensity score-matched analysis
Brandon Muncan1, Andrea Amabile2, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Background:
Current literature reports better short-term mortality rates in mitral valve repair over replacement in elderly patients. However, valve durability, postoperative complications, and reintervention rates in these cohorts remain understudied. As such, we aimed to investigate 5-year rates of mortality and reoperation after initial mitral repair or replacement in elderly patients.
Methods:
Using the TriNetX Research Network database, we identified patients aged ≥70 who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement for nonrheumatic mitral insufficiency between January 2010 and December 2020. We 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts for 33 covariates including demographics, comorbidities, and surgical history. After matching, we compared 5-year mortality and reoperation rates between cohorts using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
Results:
We compared 823 mitral valve repair patients to a propensity score-matched cohort of 823 mitral valve replacement patients over a 5-year follow-up period. All variables of interest were adequately matched. Cumulative 5-year mortality rate was significantly lower among mitral valve repair patients (17.0% vs. 24.9%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.51-0.87, p < 0.0025). Reoperation rates at 5-year did not differ (2.6% vs. 2,1%; HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.67-2.68, p = 0.401).
Conclusions:
We observed lower 5-year mortality rates and nonsignificantly different reoperation rates among elderly patients with mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve repair compared to replacement. Our data support the current understanding that mitral valve repair should be considered as the first treatment line whenever possible, even in elderly patients.
Insights
Mitral valve repair in elderly patients shows lower 5-year mortality compared to replacement, with similar reoperation rates. This supports repair as a primary treatment option for mitral regurgitation in this age group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- Elderly patients undergoing mitral valve surgery have better short-term survival with repair versus replacement.
- Long-term data on valve durability, complications, and reoperation rates after mitral valve repair in the elderly are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 5-year mortality and reoperation rates after mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients aged 70 years and older.
Main Methods:
- A propensity score-matched analysis of 823 patients undergoing mitral valve repair and 823 undergoing replacement for nonrheumatic mitral insufficiency (2010-2020) using the TriNetX database.
- Comparison of 5-year Kaplan-Meier mortality and reoperation rates between the matched cohorts.
Main Results:
- Mitral valve repair was associated with significantly lower 5-year mortality (17.0% vs. 24.9%; HR: 0.66; p < 0.0025).
- Five-year reoperation rates were similar between the repair and replacement groups (2.6% vs. 2.1%; HR: 1.34; p = 0.401).
Conclusions:
- Mitral valve repair in elderly patients with mitral regurgitation is associated with reduced 5-year mortality compared to replacement.
- Reoperation rates at 5 years were comparable, supporting mitral valve repair as a preferred initial treatment strategy in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

