Stroke and mortality rates after off-pump vs. pump-assisted/no-clamp coronary artery bypass grafting

George V Letsou1,2, Fadi I Musfee3, Qianzi Zhang1

  • 1Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Insights

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) techniques, including off-pump and pump-assisted no-clamp methods, achieve very low stroke rates. Avoiding aortic clamping is key to reducing CABG-related stroke risk, with similar mortality across techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Neurosurgery
  • Anesthesiology

Background:

  • Ascending aorta manipulation during on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) increases stroke risk.
  • Off-pump surgery and pump-assisted surgery without aortic clamping are strategies to mitigate this risk.
  • This study compares the efficacy of these techniques in reducing stroke and perioperative mortality.

Approach:

  • A retrospective review of 570 consecutive coronary artery bypass grafting procedures (June 2011-October 2017).
  • Procedures included off-pump/no-bypass, pump-assisted/no-clamp, and combined techniques.
  • Patient characteristics and outcomes (stroke, mortality) were analyzed by surgical approach.

Key Points:

  • None of the pump-assisted/no-clamp patients experienced a stroke, compared to 0.3% for off-pump/no-bypass and 0.8% for combined techniques.
  • Patients over 70, female, or with comorbidities were more likely to receive pump-assisted or combined procedures.
  • Stroke and in-hospital mortality rates did not significantly differ between the techniques.

Conclusions:

  • A hybrid approach utilizing off-pump, pump-assisted, and combined techniques yields very low stroke rates in coronary revascularization.
  • Avoiding aortic clamping appears critical for reducing CABG-associated stroke.
  • Off-pump/no-bypass surgery demonstrated no significant stroke reduction advantage over pump-assisted/no-clamp or combined methods.
Abstract