Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Evaluating bioretention scale effect on stormwater retention and pollutant removal
Glaucia Ghesti Pivetta1, Rutineia Tassi2, Daniel Gustavo Allasia Piccilli2
1Cidade Universitária, Centro de Tecnologia - Prédio INPE - Sala 2061, Av. Roraima n◦ 1000, Bairro Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil. glaucia.pivetta@gmail.com.
Bioretention column diameter affects nitrate removal, with smaller columns showing higher efficiency. Larger columns may even increase nitrate concentration in stormwater runoff, indicating scale effects are crucial for accurate results.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Water Quality Management
- Stormwater Runoff Treatment
Background:
- Bioretention columns are vital laboratory tools for assessing pollutant removal from stormwater.
- Existing research lacks guidance on optimal bioretention column diameters and scale-up uncertainties.
- Understanding scale effects is critical for reliable laboratory-to-field transfer of bioretention performance data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of varying bioretention column diameters on stormwater runoff retention and pollutant removal.
- To assess the influence of column size on the variability and reliability of experimental results.
- To determine if laboratory-scale bioretention studies accurately predict field-scale performance, particularly for nitrate.
Main Methods:
- Experimental assessment of three sets of bioretention columns with diameters of 400 mm, 300 mm, and 200 mm.
- Monitoring of runoff retention (R) and removal efficiencies for Total Suspended Solids (TSS), nitrite, phosphate, and nitrate.
- Statistical analysis to compare pollutant removal across different column diameters and identify scale-dependent effects.
Main Results:
- Runoff retention (R) was independent of column diameter but influenced by the time between events; diameter affected R variability.
- High removal rates were observed for TSS (95%), nitrite (98%), and phosphate (96%), with some variability across diameters.
- Nitrate removal varied significantly: 300-mm and 200-mm columns achieved >50% removal, while 400-mm columns released up to 285% more nitrate.
Conclusions:
- Bioretention column diameter significantly influences nitrate removal efficiency, with smaller scales performing better.
- Larger diameter columns (400 mm) can act as nitrate sources, highlighting scale effects in bioretention research.
- Results from small-diameter bioretention columns may not reliably predict field-scale performance, necessitating careful consideration of experimental scale.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Bioremediation
Factors Affecting Solubility

