Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Evaluating Patient Identification Practices During Intrahospital Transfers: A Human Factors Approach
Stefanie Suclupe, Joanne Kitchin1, Rajhkumar Sivalingam1
1From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Introduction:
Reliable patient identification is essential for safe care, and failures may cause patient harm. Identification can be interfered with by system factors, including working conditions, technology, organizational barriers, and inadequate communications protocols. The study aims to explore systems factors contributing to patient identification errors during intrahospital transfers.
Methods:
We conducted a qualitative study through direct observation and interviews with porters during intrahospital patient transfers. Data were analyzed using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety human factors model. The patient transfer process was mapped and compared with the institutional Positive Patient Identification policy. Potential system failures were identified using a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.
Results:
A total of 60 patient transfer handovers were observed. In none of the evaluable cases observed, patient identification was conducted correctly according to the hospital policy at every step of the process. The principal system factor responsible was organizational failure, followed by technology and team culture issues. The Failure Modes and Effects Analysis methodology revealed that miscommunication between staff and lack of key patient information put patient safety at risk.
Conclusions:
Patient identification during intrahospital patient transfer is a high-risk event because several factors and many people interact. In this study, the disconnect between the policy and the reality of the workplace left staff and patients vulnerable to the consequences of misidentification. Where a policy is known to be substantially different from work as done, urgent revision is required to eliminate the serious risks associated with the unguided evolution of working practice.
More Related Videos
06:49Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
Published on: December 11, 2015
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.
Step 3: Assess the patient's...