Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Free-energy pragmatics: Markov blankets don't prescribe objective ontology, and that's okay
Inês Hipólito1, Thomas van Es2
1Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany ines.hipolito@hu-berlin.de http://www.ineshipolito.org/.
Abstract:
We target the ontological and epistemological ramifications of the proposed distinction between Friston and Pearl blankets. We emphasize the need for empirical testing next to computational modeling. A peculiar aspect of the free energy principle (FEP) is its purported support of radically opposed ontologies of the mind. In our view, the objective ontological aspiration itself should be rejected for a pragmatic instrumentalist view.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Understanding Consciousness
Sleep, a crucial state, is characterized by reduced...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...

