Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025
Transcanalicular Diode Laser-assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy for the Treatment of Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
Published on: October 13, 2017
Is Heterotopic Ossification Removal From Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Prosthesis Using Er,Cr:YSGG Laser
Ryan C Kelm1, Mozart Queiroz Neto2, Songyun Liu3
1Resident, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shreveport, LA.
Purpose:
Heterotopic ossification (HO) formed over the major components and fixation screw heads of an alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) prosthesis can result in decreased quality of life, limited function, prosthesis failure, and hinder prosthesis revision, replacement, or removal. This study simulated HO removal from the major components and fixation screw heads of alloplastic TMJR prostheses using an erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser and compared the results to conventional methods of HO removal. The surface morphology and chemical structure of the exposed components were analyzed. The investigators hypothesize that HO removal with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser causes less damage to TMJR prosthesis components compared to conventional HO removal methods.
Methods:
This multiple test descriptive analysis simulated HO removal from TMJR prostheses mounted to stereolithic models. Simulated HO removal was completed using a novel Er,Cr:YSGG laser method and conventional methods which utilized a fissure carbide bur in a high-speed rotary instrument, a standard osteotome, and an ultrasonic aspirator. Surfaces exposed on the TMJR prostheses were analyzed for morphological or chemical change using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy.
Results:
The Er,Cr:YSGG laser did not adversely affect the titanium screws or titanium components of the TMJR prostheses, while conventional methods of HO removal did. HO removal using the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and conventional methods both inflicted surface damage to the fossa ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene component of the TMJR prostheses.
Conclusion:
Damage inflicted to titanium alloy or commercially pure titanium components of TMJR prostheses by conventional HO removal methods can be avoided by instead removing HO with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser. However, long exposure of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser to ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene surfaces should be avoided. Additional research to expand on applications to other procedures and in other surgical fields is encouraged.
