Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Effect of direct stenting on microvascular dysfunction during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial
Byung Gyu Kim1, Sung Woo Cho2, Jongkwon Seo1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Direct stenting (DS) without predilatation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) did not improve microvascular reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Further large trials are needed to confirm these findings on microvascular resistance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Myocardial Infarction Research
Background:
- Microvascular dysfunction is a key complication following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- The role of direct stenting (DS) versus conventional stenting (CS) with predilatation in mitigating microvascular dysfunction during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of DS without predilatation on microvascular reperfusion compared to CS with predilatation in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI.
- To assess the effect of DS on the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and other reperfusion markers.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving 72 patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI.
- Patients were assigned to either DS or CS with predilatation groups.
- The primary endpoint was the post-PPCI index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), with secondary endpoints including thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion (TMP) grades, ST-segment resolution, and clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in immediate microvascular reperfusion parameters (IMR, TMP grade, ST-segment resolution) between the DS and CS groups.
- A higher proportion of patients in the CS group experienced no-reflow or cardiogenic shock, preventing IMR measurement, compared to the DS group.
- Long-term left ventricular functional recovery and clinical outcomes were similar in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Direct stenting without predilatation did not demonstrate a significant effect on the index of microcirculatory resistance in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.
- The study's findings warrant cautious interpretation due to a higher number of unmeasurable IMR cases in the conventional stenting group.
- A larger, randomized clinical trial is necessary to definitively ascertain the benefits of direct stenting on microvascular reperfusion.
Objective:
Whether direct stenting (DS) without predilatation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) reduces microvascular dysfunction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction is unclear. We performed a randomized study to assess the effect of DS on microvascular reperfusion.
Methods:
Seventy-two patients undergoing PPCI were randomly assigned to the DS or conventional stenting (CS) with predilatation groups. The primary endpoint was the post-PPCI index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). We compared thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion (TMP) grades, ST-segment resolution, and long-term clinical outcomes between the groups.
Results:
Microvascular reperfusion parameters immediately after PPCI (e.g., the IMR, TMP grade, and ST-segment resolution) were not different between the groups. However, significantly fewer patients in the DS group had the IMR measured because of no-reflow or cardiogenic shock during PPCI than those in the CS group. No differences were found in left ventricular functional recovery or clinical outcomes between the groups.
Conclusions:
This trial showed no effect of DS on the IMR. However, our finding should be interpreted with caution because the number of patients who could not have the IMR measured was higher in the CS group than in the DS group. A larger randomized trial is required (Research Registry number: 8079).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

