Surgical atrial appendage closure: time for a randomized study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and is assumed to affect more than 30 million people worldwide. Studies report that the left atrial appendage (LAA) plays an important role in thrombus formation and is considered the embolic source in 90% of affected patients with non-valvular and 57% with valvular AF. Oral anticoagulants have been the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with AF for decades. However, bleeding complications and noncompliance are barriers to effective embolic protection. Therefore, as an alternative to conventional anti-thrombotic therapy, surgical LAA occlusion, which may lead to a reduced risk of thromboembolism, has received increasing attention. However, the procedure can be associated with additional risks such as prolonged operation time, damage to the circumflex coronary artery, and incomplete LAA occlusion. This review discusses some of the observational studies that have examined the impact of LAA occlusion on stroke, the LAAOS III (Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study) trial, which provided definitive evidence for the benefit of surgical LAA occlusion on ischemic stroke, which surgical methods are safe and effective for LAA occlusion, and whether oral anticoagulation can be stopped after surgical removal of the LAA.