Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
Assuming accuracy, pretending influence? Risks of measuring, monitoring and reporting sustainable development goals
Jari Lyytimäki1, Nicolas Eckert2, Robert Lepenies3
1Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland. jari.lyytimaki@syke.fi.
Abstract:
From the local to global level, indicators and reports are produced and published to support the transition towards sustainable development. Building from two European-level science-policy workshops, this perspective essay discusses the types of risks involved with such sustainability reporting. The analysis is rooted in the framework of the UN 2030 Agenda and sustainable development goals (SDG). As a globally adopted framework, it provides an example of how risks are either recognised and framed, or non-recognised. Well recognised risks include data availability for SDGs and siloed preparation of indicators, while risks receiving less attention are ritualistic reporting lacking a critical evaluation of the limitations of the SDG framework itself. These different risks are likely to reinforce each other. A specific risk is a too narrow focus on one-way communication aiming to inform individual policy decisions. Risks related to SDGs are best managed with iterative, integrative and interactive knowledge production fostering holistic understanding.
Related Concept Videos
Sustainable Development
Naturalistic Observations
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

