Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026
Production of Germ-Free Fast-Growing Broilers from a Commercial Line for Microbiota Studies
Published on: June 18, 2020
Integrated omics analysis reveals differences in gut microbiota and gut-host metabolite profiles between obese and
Jie Liu1, Jie Wang1, Yan Zhou1
1Poultry Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 250100, Ji'nan, China; Poultry Breeding Engineering Technology Center of Shandong Province, 250100, Ji'nan, China.
Abstract:
Abdominal fat is the major adipose tissue in chickens. In chicken, the deposition of abdominal fat affects meat yield and quality. Previous reports suggest that gut microbiota composition and function are associated with lipid metabolism. In this study, we used comparative metagenomics and metabolomics analysis to determine the gut microbiota and gut-host metabolite profiles in Shouguang (SG; a Chinese chicken breed with low-fat deposition) and Luqin (LQ; a fatty-type chicken breed with a fast growth rate) chickens. The results showed that LQ chickens had higher body weight, eviscerated yield, abdominal fat yield, abdominal fat ratio, and triglyceride (TG) content in the breast muscle than SG chickens. Untargeted metabolomics analyses showed a total of 11 liver metabolites, 19 plasma metabolites, and 30 cecal metabolites differentially enriched in LQ and SG chickens based on variable importance in the projection (VIP) ≥ 1 and P ≤ 0.05. These metabolites are involved in lipid and amino acid metabolism. The relative abundance of bacteria in the microbiota differed significantly between the 2 chicken breeds. The functional prediction of microbiota abundant in LQ chickens was starch and lactose degradation. Erysipelatoclostridium was abundant in LQ chickens and significantly positively correlated to palmitoyl ethanolamide (PEA), a key regulator of lipid metabolism. Our findings revealed differences in liver and plasma metabolites between chicken breeds with different adipose deposition capacities. Long-chain acylcarnitines might be important markers of adipose deposition differences in chickens. The cecum's microbial communities and metabolome profiles significantly differed between LQ and SG chickens. However, the relationship between cecal microbiota and their metabolites and liver and plasma metabolites is not thoroughly understood. Future research will focus on relating tissue metabolite changes to intestinal microbiota and their effects on body fat deposition.
