Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)
Published on: February 7, 2025
Criteria for the selection of paediatric patients susceptible to reconciliation error
Dolores Pilar Iturgoyen Fuentes1, Clara Meneses Mangas2, Margarita Cuervas Mons Vendrell3
1Pharmacy Service, Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus, Madrid, Spain dipifuentes@gmail.com.
Insights
Medication reconciliation errors are common in pediatric hospital admissions. School-aged children, polymedicated patients, and those with neurological or onco-hematological diseases face higher risks, necessitating targeted interventions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Patient Safety
- Medication Error Prevention
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Medication errors during care transitions pose significant patient safety risks.
- Medication reconciliation is proven effective in adults but understudied in pediatrics.
- No established guidelines exist for prioritizing pediatric patients for reconciliation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify risk factors for medication reconciliation errors in pediatric patients.
- To inform the development of targeted medication reconciliation strategies for high-risk pediatric populations.
- To improve patient safety during pediatric care transitions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of pediatric patients admitted between January and November 2018.
- Inclusion of patients experiencing at least one medication reconciliation error.
- Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors and calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Main Results:
- School-aged and adolescent patients had over double the risk of reconciliation errors compared to younger children (OR 2.32-2.68).
- Polymedicated patients faced a five-fold increased risk (OR 4.48).
- Patients with neurological or onco-hematological diseases had significantly higher risks (OR 11.97 and 9.96, respectively).
- Use of narrow therapeutic index medications increased error risk by nearly three times (OR 2.98).
Conclusions:
- The pediatric population exhibits specific risk factors for medication reconciliation errors.
- Identifying these factors enables prioritization of medication reconciliation efforts.
- Further validation in larger, diverse pediatric populations across different settings is recommended.
Objectives:
Many medication errors occur during care transitions, which are critical points for patient safety. There is strong evidence in favour of medication reconciliation as a strategy to avoid errors in adults, though few studies have been made in the paediatric setting. Likewise, no recommendations have been established for the selection and/or prioritisation of paediatric patients amenable to reconciliation.
Methods:
A retrospective study was conducted involving patients subjected to reconciliation by a pharmacist on admission to hospital and who experienced at least one reconciliation error between January and November 2018. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify possible factors associated with reconciliation error, using a logistic regression model to determine the odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
Results:
The group of patients with at least one reconciliation error included 334 patients, compared with the group of patients without reconciliation errors, which included 1426 patients. It was determined that schoolchildren and adolescent patients had a risk of presenting a reconciliation error on hospital admission that was more than double for younger patients (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.25, and OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.44 to 4.99, respectively). This risk was multiplied by five if we compared polymedicated patients versus non-polymedicated patients (OR 4.48, 95% CI 3.35 to 5.99). Patients with a neurological or onco-haematological underlying disease had a 12 and 10 times higher risk of presenting a reconciliation error compared with patients with other types of underlying diseases (OR 11.97, 95% CI 7.57 to 18.92, and OR 9.96, 95% CI 6.09 to 16.28, respectively). Finally, patients with narrow therapeutic index medicines in their usual treatment had an almost three times greater risk of presenting a reconciliation error when admitted to the hospital, although this last factor was not determined as an independent risk factor as for the others (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.22 to 3.99).
Conclusions:
The paediatric population is characterised by a number of risk factors for reconciliation error. Knowledge of these factors can allow the prioritisation of medication reconciliation in a concrete group of patients. In order to generalise the results obtained in this study, they must be confirmed in other paediatric care settings involving larger samples and different types of patients.
More Related Videos
08:26Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Published on: January 11, 2016
15:18Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test