Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

An Intestine/Liver Microphysiological System for Drug Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Assessment
Published on: December 3, 2020
A physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model for disposition of FF-10832
Takeshi Matsumoto1, Yusuke Masuo2, Anna Tanaka2
1Bioscience and Engineering Laboratories, FUJIFILM Corporation, 577 Ushijima, Kaisei-machi, Ashigarakami-gun Kanagawa 258-8577, Japan; Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Japan.
Abstract:
This study aimed to quantitatively clarify the critical factors responsible for the superior antitumor efficacy of a liposomal gemcitabine (2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC) formulation, FF-10832, compared with dFdC. The underlying hypothesis is the different exposure of tumors to its active metabolite, dFdC triphosphate (dFdCTP), between the two formulations. Therefore, physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) models for encapsulated and unencapsulated dFdC were constructed considering the tumor dFdCTP concentration as an index of antitumor activity. To estimate drug the parameters, the time profiles of encapsulated and unencapsulated dFdC in the blood and those of dFdC and dFdCTP in tumors were measured following the intravenous bolus administration of FF-10832 or dFdC. dFdC metabolism and transport in the liver S9 fraction and isolated hepatocytes, respectively, were experimentally determined. The tumor growth curve in a mouse xenograft model following the administration of FF10832 and dFdC was also used to construct the PD model. The sensitivity analysis of the PBPK/PD model revealed the critical factors affecting antitumor efficacy, which included the total and intratumor tissue uptake clearances for liposomal formulation and the cytidine deaminase and deoxycytidine deaminase activities in tumors. Thus, these parameters are potential biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of the liposomal formulation of dFdC.
More Related Videos
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
10:02Use of Rabbit Eyes in Pharmacokinetic Studies of Intraocular Drugs
Published on: July 23, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion,...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model