Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Kinase Inhibitor Screening In Self-assembled Human Protein Microarrays
Published on: October 23, 2019
Comparative kinase and cancer cell panel profiling of kinase inhibitors approved for clinical use from 2018 to 2020
Jeffrey J Kooijman1, Wilhelmina E van Riel1, Jelle Dylus1
1Oncolines B.V., Oss, Netherlands.
Abstract:
During the last two decades, kinase inhibitors have become the major drug class for targeted cancer therapy. Although the number of approved kinase inhibitors increases rapidly, comprehensive in vitro profiling and comparison of inhibitor activities is often lacking in the public domain. Here we report the extensive profiling and comparison of 21 kinase inhibitors approved by the FDA for oncology indications since June 2018 and 13 previously approved comparators on panels of 255 biochemical kinase assays and 134 cancer cell line viability assays. Comparison of the cellular inhibition profiles of the EGFR inhibitors gefitinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib identified the uncommon EGFR p.G719S mutation as a common response marker for EGFR inhibitors. Additionally, the FGFR inhibitors erdafitinib, infigratinib, and pemigatinib potently inhibited the viability of cell lines which harbored oncogenic alterations in FGFR1-3, irrespective of the specific clinical indications of the FGFR inhibitors. These results underscore the utility of in vitro kinase inhibitor profiling in cells for identifying new potential stratification markers for patient selection. Furthermore, comparison of the in vitro inhibition profiles of the RET inhibitors pralsetinib and selpercatinib revealed they had very similar biochemical and cellular selectivity. As an exception, an NTRK3 fusion-positive cell line was potently inhibited by pralsetinib but not by selpercatinib, which could be explained by the targeting of TRK kinases in biochemical assays by pralsetinib but not selpercatinib. This illustrates that unexpected differences in cellular activities between inhibitors that act through the same primary target can be explained by subtle differences in biochemical targeting. Lastly, FLT3-mutant cell lines were responsive to both FLT3 inhibitors gilteritinib and midostaurin, and the PI3K inhibitor duvelisib. Biochemical profiling revealed that the FLT3 and PI3K inhibitors targeted distinct kinases, indicating that unique dependencies can be identified by combined biochemical and cellular profiling of kinase inhibitors. This study provides the first large scale kinase assay or cell panel profiling study for newly approved kinase inhibitors, and shows that comprehensive in vitro profiling of kinase inhibitors can provide rationales for therapy selection and indication expansion of approved kinase inhibitors.
Insights
Comprehensive profiling of newly approved kinase inhibitors reveals their effectiveness in targeted cancer therapy. This study identifies new patient stratification markers and explains unexpected drug responses through detailed biochemical and cellular activity comparisons.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology and Oncology
- Drug Discovery and Development
- Molecular Biology and Genetics
Background:
- Kinase inhibitors are a major class of targeted cancer therapies, with a rapidly increasing number of approved drugs.
- Comprehensive in vitro profiling and comparison data for these inhibitors are often lacking in the public domain.
- Understanding inhibitor activity across various targets and cell lines is crucial for optimizing cancer treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct extensive in vitro profiling of 21 recently FDA-approved oncology kinase inhibitors and 13 comparators.
- To compare their activities using biochemical kinase assays and cancer cell line viability assays.
- To identify potential patient stratification markers and explain unexpected drug response differences.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 255 biochemical kinase assays to profile inhibitor activities.
- Employed 134 cancer cell line viability assays to assess cellular responses.
- Compared profiling data for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR), RET, FLT3, and PI3K inhibitors.
Main Results:
- Identified the EGFR p.G719S mutation as a response marker for EGFR inhibitors (gefitinib, dacomitinib, osimertinib).
- FGFR inhibitors (erdafitinib, infigratinib, pemigatinib) potently inhibited cell lines with FGFR1-3 alterations.
- Pralsetinib showed unique activity against an NTRK3 fusion-positive cell line not seen with selpercatinib, explained by differential TRK kinase targeting.
Conclusions:
- In vitro kinase inhibitor profiling in cells is valuable for identifying new patient stratification markers.
- Subtle differences in biochemical targeting can explain unexpected cellular activity variations between inhibitors.
- Comprehensive profiling provides rationales for therapy selection and potential indication expansion for approved kinase inhibitors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Protein Kinases and Phosphatases

