Kinematics of a cervical disc prosthesis implanted above or below one- and two-level fusions

The theoretical advantages of hybrid constructs over multi-level fusion have been illustrated in clinical and biomechanical studies. However, there is no biomechanical data on hybrid constructs using load control analyses. There is also no clear data on whether there is a biomechanical difference if the arthroplasty is below or above a 1- or 2-level fusion. This work investigated the effect on segmental motion of having a cervical total disc arthroplasty implanted above or below a 1- or 2-level fusion.

Segmental motions of 16 C2-T1 cervical spine specimens were measured as the specimens were tested to 1.5Nm in axial rotation and in flexion-extension under compressive preload. Tests were conducted on intact specimens, and then after arthroplasty with a 1-level and 2-level fusion. 8 specimens were in test Group 1, where the hybrid configuration had a total disc arthroplasty above a 1- or 2-level fusion. The arthroplasty was below the 1- and 2-level fusion in Group 2. Load control and displacement control analyses were conducted to determine the effect of the hybrid configurations on segmental motion.

In load control, compensatory motion increases were found at all non-instrumented cervical spine segments in flexion-extension and axial rotation. Flexion-extension and axial rotation ranges of motion at the total disc arthroplasty level were less than 1° different than intact.In displacement control, there was no consistent pattern of compensatory motion. Range of motion at the arthroplasty level was within 3.5° of intact.

The total disc arthroplasty segmental level in a hybrid construct has similar amounts of motion as intact. This may shield the arthroplasty level and adjacent levels from supra-physiological motion and loading. These results suggest that a hybrid construct may be protective of adjacent segments, whether the total disc arthroplasty is above or below the fusion.