Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
Chi Woo Samuel Chow1, Tak Lit Derek Fung2, Pak Tat Chan2
1Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. samuelchowcw@gmail.com.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal polyps shows variable outcomes. Submucosal fibrosis, hybrid snaring, procedure time, patient age, and polyp size significantly impact ESD success rates and complications.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Endoscopic Surgery
- Oncology
Background:
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for complex colorectal polyps.
- Clinical outcomes of ESD for colorectal polyps are inconsistent globally.
- Identifying factors influencing ESD outcomes is crucial for improving patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and analyze factors significantly affecting outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal polyps.
- To identify predictors of successful resection and complications in ESD procedures.
- To provide data for developing strategies to enhance ESD efficacy.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 220 colorectal polyps treated with ESD between January 2016 and December 2020.
- Data collected included patient demographics, ESD technical details, and polyp characteristics.
- Primary outcomes were en bloc and R0 resection rates; secondary outcomes included recurrence, complications, and hospital stay.
Main Results:
- En bloc and R0 resection rates were 97.3% and 65%, respectively.
- Submucosal fibrosis was linked to lower resection rates, increased perforation, bleeding, and post-polypectomy syndrome.
- Hybrid snaring, longer ESD duration, younger age, and larger polyp size were also associated with adverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Submucosal fibrosis, hybrid snaring technique, procedure duration, patient age, and polyp size are significant factors influencing ESD outcomes.
- Understanding these factors can guide the development of improved strategies for endoscopic submucosal dissection.
- Targeted interventions based on identified risk factors may enhance the success and safety of ESD for colorectal polyps.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
05:57ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: