Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Does 'Data fudging' explain the autocratic advantage? Evidence from the gap between Official Covid-19 mortality and
Eric Neumayer1, Thomas Plümper2
1Department of Geography & Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK.
Abstract:
Governments can underreport Covid-19 mortality to make their performance appear more successful than it is. Autocracies are more likely to 'fudge' these data since many autocratic regimes restrict media freedom and thus can prevent domestic media from reporting evidence of undercounting deaths. Autocracies also enjoy greater leverage over reporting health authorities to either fudge data or adopt restrictive definitions of what constitutes Covid-19 mortality. Controlling for other factors that explain official Covid-19 mortality, excess mortality and the difference between the two, our results suggest that any apparent 'autocratic advantage' in fighting the pandemic is likely to only exist in official Covid-19 mortality. Analyzing the gap between excess mortality and official Covid-19 mortality we find that autocracies on average have a larger gap between official Covid-19 mortality data and excess mortality data, which points towards 'autocratic data fudging' of their official Covid-19 mortality statistics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Causality in Epidemiology
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Censoring Survival Data
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

