Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
How do children view and categorise human and dog facial expressions?
Catia Correia-Caeiro1,2,3, Abbey Lawrence1, Abdelhady Abdelrahman4
1School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.
Insights
Children view dog and human faces differently, focusing more on dogs and specific facial areas. Recognizing dog expressions may require explicit training, unlike human expressions learned through familiarity.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Comparative Cognition
- Social Neuroscience
Background:
- Understanding facial expressions is crucial for social interactions involving humans and companion animals.
- Children's social world includes both humans and animals, necessitating effective interpretation of diverse facial cues.
- Previous research has primarily focused on children's recognition of human facial expressions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how children (4-10 years old) visually scan and categorize facial expressions in adult humans and dogs.
- To compare children's gaze patterns (Proportion of Viewing Time, PVT) and emotion categorization accuracy (ECA) for human versus dog faces.
- To explore the influence of age, sex, and experience with dogs on children's facial expression processing.
Main Methods:
- An eye-tracking experiment was conducted with children aged 4-10 years.
- Participants viewed images of adult human and dog facial expressions (positive, negative, neutral).
- Data collected included viewing patterns (PVT) of facial regions and accuracy in labeling expressions (ECA).
Main Results:
- Children spent more time viewing dogs than humans and focused more on negative human expressions.
- Viewing patterns varied by species and emotion; dogs' mouths were viewed as much as or more than eyes, unlike human faces.
- Emotion categorization accuracy was better for valence than specific emotions, and easier for human than dog expressions.
Conclusions:
- Children exhibit distinct visual processing and recognition strategies for human versus dog facial expressions.
- Familiarity with human faces may suffice for basic expression recognition, but competence with dog faces likely requires explicit training.
- Findings highlight differences in processing 'own-face-types' (humans) versus 'other-face-types' (dogs) during childhood development.
Abstract:
Children are often surrounded by other humans and companion animals (e.g., dogs, cats); and understanding facial expressions in all these social partners may be critical to successful social interactions. In an eye-tracking study, we examined how children (4-10 years old) view and label facial expressions in adult humans and dogs. We found that children looked more at dogs than humans, and more at negative than positive or neutral human expressions. Their viewing patterns (Proportion of Viewing Time, PVT) at individual facial regions were also modified by the viewed species and emotion, with the eyes not always being most viewed: this related to positive anticipation when viewing humans, whilst when viewing dogs, the mouth was viewed more or equally compared to the eyes for all emotions. We further found that children's labelling (Emotion Categorisation Accuracy, ECA) was better for the perceived valence than for emotion category, with positive human expressions easier than both positive and negative dog expressions. They performed poorly when asked to freely label facial expressions, but performed better for human than dog expressions. Finally, we found some effects of age, sex, and other factors (e.g., experience with dogs) on both PVT and ECA. Our study shows that children have a different gaze pattern and identification accuracy compared to adults, for viewing faces of human adults and dogs. We suggest that for recognising human (own-face-type) expressions, familiarity obtained through casual social interactions may be sufficient; but for recognising dog (other-face-type) expressions, explicit training may be required to develop competence. HIGHLIGHTS: We conducted an eye-tracking experiment to investigate how children view and categorise facial expressions in adult humans and dogs Children's viewing patterns were significantly dependent upon the facial region, species, and emotion viewed Children's categorisation also varied with the species and emotion viewed, with better performance for valence than emotion categories Own-face-types (adult humans) are easier than other-face-types (dogs) for children, and casual familiarity (e.g., through family dogs) to the latter is not enough to achieve perceptual competence.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Emotional Expression
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
Nonconscious Mimicry
Labeling Emotion
Muscles for Facial Expressions
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...

