Micro-TESE strategy in patients with NOA caused by AZFc deletion: synchronous or asynchronous?

Jiaming Mao1,2, Chenyao Deng2, Lianming Zhao2

  • 1Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.

Zygote (Cambridge, England)
|October 7, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Synchronous microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) improves sperm utilization and live birth rates in infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) due to AZFc deletion. This strategy enhances conception success for affected individuals.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Urology

Background:

  • Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) affects infertile men, with Y chromosome AZFc region deletions being a significant genetic cause.
  • Surgical sperm retrieval techniques like microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) offer hope for conception in NOA patients.
  • The timing of sperm retrieval (synchronous vs. asynchronous) may impact treatment outcomes and sperm utilization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of synchronous and asynchronous micro-TESE strategies in NOA patients with AZFc deletions.
  • To evaluate sperm retrieval and utilization rates between the two surgical approaches.
  • To assess intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes, including fertilization, pregnancy, and live birth rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of clinical data from NOA patients with AZFc deletions undergoing micro-TESE.
  • Comparison of sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and sperm utilization rate between synchronous and asynchronous groups.
  • Evaluation of ICSI outcomes: fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, and cumulative live birth rate.

Main Results:

  • Sperm utilization rates were significantly higher in the synchronous group (98.9%) compared to the asynchronous group (50.0%).
  • While fertilization and high-quality embryo rates showed no significant difference, the synchronous group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate (40.0% vs. 12.5%) with fresh sperm.
  • The asynchronous group had a lower abortion rate (7.1%) and cumulative live birth rate (7.1%) compared to the synchronous group (30.4% and 30.6%, respectively).

Conclusions:

  • NOA patients with AZFc deletions have a high probability of successful sperm retrieval via micro-TESE for conception using ICSI.
  • Synchronous micro-TESE is recommended to maximize sperm utilization and improve cumulative live birth rates.
  • The choice of surgical strategy significantly impacts sperm utilization and overall reproductive success in this patient population.