Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
Published on: July 17, 2020
Cadence in youth long-distance runners is predicted by leg length and running speed
Jeffery A Taylor-Haas1, Micah C Garcia2, Mitchell J Rauh3
1Division of Occupational and Physical Therapy, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Background:
Lower cadence has been previously associated with injury in long-distance runners. Variations in cadence may be related to experience, speed, and anthropometric variables. It is unknown what factors, if any, predict cadence in healthy youth long-distance runners.
Research Question:
Are demographic, anthropometric and/or biomechanical variables able to predict cadence in healthy youth long-distance runners.
Methods:
A cohort of 138 uninjured youth long-distance runners (M = 62, F = 76; Mean ± SD; age = 13.7 ± 2.7; mass = 47.9 ± 13.6 kg; height = 157.9 ± 14.5 cm; running volume = 19.2 ± 20.6 km/wk; running experience: males = 3.5 ± 2.1 yrs, females = 3.3 ± 2.0 yrs) were recruited for the study. Multiple linear regression (MLR) models were developed for total sample and for each sex independently that only included variables that were significantly correlated to self-selected cadence. A variance inflation factor (VIF) assessed multicollinearity of variables. If VIF≥ 5, variable(s) were removed and the MLR analysis was conducted again.
Results:
For all models, VIF was > 5 between speed and normalized stride length, therefore we removed normalized stride length from all models. Only leg length and speed were significantly correlated (p < .001) with cadence in the regression models for total sample (R2 = 51.9 %) and females (R2 = 48.2 %). The regression model for all participants was Cadence = -1.251 *Leg Length + 3.665 *Speed + 254.858. The regression model for females was Cadence = -1.190 *Leg Length + 3.705 *Speed + 249.688. For males, leg length, cadence, and running experience were significantly predictive (p < .001) of cadence in the model (R2 = 54.7 %). The regression model for males was Cadence = -1.268 *Leg Length + 3.471 *Speed - 1.087 *Running Experience + 261.378.
Significance:
Approximately 50 % of the variance in cadence was explained by the individual's leg length and running speed. Shorter leg lengths and faster running speeds were associated with higher cadence. For males, fewer years of running experience was associated with a higher cadence.
More Related Videos
10:08Effects of a Novel Neuromuscular Training Intervention on Jump, Sprint, and Change of Direction in Adult Female Soccer Players
Published on: June 10, 2025
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Relative Velocity in One Dimension
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Longitudinal Research
Speed of a Transverse Wave
One of the key properties of any wave is the wave speed. Light...
Relative Velocity in Two Dimensions
Interpreting Run Charts