Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Impact of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary
Lorenzo Azzalini1, Milan Seth2, Devraj Sukul2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Insights
Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is linked to worse outcomes and higher mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with LVEDP ≥26 mm Hg undergoing elective PCI require careful pre-procedural optimization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hemodynamics
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is a critical hemodynamic marker for assessing left ventricular function and its impact on coronary perfusion.
- Understanding the association between LVEDP and patient outcomes post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is crucial for risk stratification and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between LVEDP levels and patient outcomes, specifically in-hospital mortality, following elective or urgent PCI.
- To identify specific LVEDP thresholds and clinical profiles associated with increased mortality risk in patients undergoing PCI.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 49,600 patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI.
- Patients were stratified into tertiles based on LVEDP (<13 mm Hg, 13-18 mm Hg, >18 mm Hg).
- A recursive partitioning tree model was used to guide decision-making for patients with high LVEDP undergoing nonemergent PCI.
Main Results:
- Patients in the highest LVEDP tertile (>18 mm Hg) exhibited worse clinical and procedural profiles and a higher incidence of in-hospital adverse outcomes, including death (0.8%).
- Elevated LVEDP was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes and mortality.
- An LVEDP ≥26 mm Hg was identified as a marker for high mortality (1.5%) in elective PCI patients, with risk varying based on clinical factors.
Conclusions:
- An elevated LVEDP, present in approximately one-third of PCI patients, is significantly associated with increased in-hospital adverse events and mortality.
- Patients with LVEDP ≥26 mm Hg undergoing elective PCI demonstrate markedly higher mortality rates, suggesting a need for pre-PCI optimization.
Abstract:
Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is an important hemodynamic marker of left ventricular performance and affects coronary perfusion. We evaluated the association of LVEDP with patient outcomes after elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We included n = 49,600 patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI. Patients were divided according to LVEDP tertile for descriptive analysis. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. A recursive partitioning tree model for mortality was built to guide decision-making in patients with high LVEDP undergoing nonemergent PCI. Overall, n = 18,099 patients had an LVEDP <13 mm Hg, n = 15,416 had an LVEDP 13 to 18 mm Hg, and n = 16,085 had an LVEDP >18 mm Hg. Patients in the high LVEDP tertile had a worse clinical and angiographic/procedural profile and experienced a higher incidence of in-hospital post-PCI adverse outcomes, including death (LVEDP <13 mm Hg 0.3% vs LVEDP 13 to 18 mm Hg 0.4% vs LVEDP >18 mm Hg 0.8%, p <0.001). An elevated LVEDP was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes including mortality. An LVEDP ≥26 mm Hg was identified as a marker of high mortality (1.5%) in patients who underwent elective PCI, with rates varying from 0.5% to 10.4%, based upon a clinical profile defined by hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, renal and left ventricular function, and atrial fibrillation. In conclusion, an elevated LVEDP is observed in 1/3 of the patients who underwent elective or urgent PCI and is associated with higher rates of in-hospital adverse outcomes, including death. Patients with an LVEDP ≥26 mm Hg who underwent elective PCI had markedly higher mortality rates, suggesting that such patients may warrant further optimization before PCI.
More Related Videos
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
09:40Induction of Right Ventricular Failure by Pulmonary Artery Constriction and Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Mice
Published on: May 13, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology