Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Conceptualising morally permissible risk imposition without quantified individual risks.

Susanne Burri1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Konstanz, Constance, Germany.

Synthese
|October 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

162
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
162
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

295
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
295
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.5K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.5K
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

117
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
117
Obedience01:08

Obedience

33.0K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
33.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Can Evidential Pluralism mitigate bias and motivated reasoning?

Synthese·2026
Same journal

AI-assisted rational decision-making.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Technological Understanding: On the cognitive skill involved in the design and use of technological artefacts.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Addictive Motivational Scaffolds and the Structure of Social Media.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

When do we experience effort?

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Prescriptive 'selves' and self-illness ambiguity.

Synthese·2025
See all related articles

Moral philosophy often focuses on quantified individual risks when assessing permissible harm. This study argues against relying on precise risk calculations, advocating for a more nuanced approach to ethical decision-making in risky situations.

Area of Science:

  • Moral Philosophy
  • Ethics
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Many ethical theories assess permissible risk imposition based on quantified individual risks.
  • Individuals often engage in activities with trivial benefits but significant risks to others.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the reliance on quantified individual risks in moral theories of permissible risk imposition.
  • To propose an alternative framework for evaluating ethical risk-taking.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical argumentation
  • Conceptual analysis
  • Critique of existing moral frameworks

Main Results:

  • Quantified individual risks are often impractical and lead to indeterminate moral judgments.
Keywords:
FrequentismPermissible risk impositionProbabilityReference class problemRiskSubjective interpretations of probability

More Related Videos

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

71.2K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

71.2K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
  • A gap frequently exists between relevant risk factors and quantifiable data.
  • Existing principles fail to provide practical guidance due to over-reliance on quantification.

    • Conclusions:

    • Principles of morally permissible risk imposition should not rely on quantified individual risks.
    • Ethical frameworks should acknowledge the limitations of quantifying risk in specific situations.
    • Acknowledge that quantitative estimates may not be tailored to idiosyncratic situations.