Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

232.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
232.2K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.4K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

28.1K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

890
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
890
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

11.2K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential Biases in Assessment of Smallest Worthwhile Difference for Statin Therapy.

JAMA internal medicine·2026
Same author

Priorities for improving paediatric diagnosis: findings from a modified Delphi study.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same author

A Randomized Trial of Interval Likelihood Ratios for Clinical Decision-Making.

NEJM evidence·2026
Same author

Characterizing Team Structure in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same author

Problem representation in the age of artificial intelligence: the state of a dying art?

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

"I was Where I Needed to be": The Rural Health Care Workforce Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Medical care research and review : MCRR·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K

Research Methods: How to Perform an Effective Peer Review.

Elise Peterson Lu1,2, Brett G Fischer3, Melissa A Plesac4

  • 1Paul C. Gaffney Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Hospital Pediatrics
|October 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This guide offers a user-friendly overview of scientific peer review, detailing its purpose, limitations, and best practices for conducting effective manuscript evaluations.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Scientific publishing

Background:

  • Scientific peer review is a long-standing cornerstone of academic publishing.
  • The exponential growth in scientific publications has led to a surge in peer review demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive user guide to the scientific peer review process.
  • To elucidate the essential roles, responsibilities, and limitations of peer review.
  • To offer practical guidance for conducting effective peer reviews.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of relevant medical publications.
  • Synthesis of collective experience from seasoned peer reviewers.
  • Development of a step-by-step framework for manuscript evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Identification of key qualities that define a competent peer reviewer.
  • Detailed outline of the purpose and inherent limitations of the peer review system.
  • A structured approach to performing a thorough and constructive peer review.

Conclusions:

  • Effective peer review is crucial for maintaining scientific integrity and quality.
  • Understanding the process enhances reviewer performance and publication standards.
  • This guide serves as a valuable resource for both new and experienced peer reviewers.